Improving the accuracy of livestock distribution estimates through spatial interpolation

作者: Ward Bryssinckx , Els Ducheyne , Bernard Muhwezi , Sunday Godfrey , Koen Mintiens

DOI: 10.4081/GH.2012.109

关键词: Spatial variabilityMissing dataMathematicsStratified samplingSpatial ecologyMultivariate interpolationStatisticsSample size determinationSampling designSample (statistics)

摘要: Animal distribution maps serve many purposes such as estimating transmission risk of zoonotic pathogens to both animals and humans. The reliability usability is highly dependent on the quality input data. However, decisions how perform livestock surveys are often based previous work without considering possible consequences. A better understanding impact using different sample designs processing steps accuracy estimates was acquired through iterative experiments detailed survey. importance size, design aggregation demonstrated spatial interpolation presented a potential way improve cattle number estimates. As expected, results show that an increasing size increased precision but these improvements were mainly seen when initial relatively low (e.g. median relative error decrease 0.04% per sampled parish for sizes below 500 parishes). For higher sizes, added value further samples declined rapidly 0.01% above parishes. When two-stage stratified applied yield more evenly distributed samples, levels densities stabilised at lower compared one-stage sampling. Aggregating resulting yielded significantly accurate because averaging under- over-estimates aggregating from subcounty district level, P <0.009 2,077 parishes samples). During aggregation, area-weighted mean values assigned administrative unit levels. this step preceded by fill in missing non-sampled areas, improved remarkably. This counts especially spatially even <0.001 170 sampling level). Whether same observations apply scale should be investigated.

参考文章(16)
P.N. de Leeuw, K. Milligan, Low altitude aerial surveys in pastoral systems research ILCA. ,(1983)
Hannes Werthner, Georgio Guariso, Environmental decision support systems (1989). pp. 240- ,(1989)
P. Desjeux, P. Cattand, K. E. Mott, I. Nuttall, New geographical approaches to control of some parasitic zoonoses Bulletin of The World Health Organization. ,vol. 73, pp. 247- 257 ,(1995)
Michael Matthies, Carlo Giupponi, Bertram Ostendorf, Environmental decision support systems: Current issues, methods and tools Environmental Modelling and Software. ,vol. 22, pp. 123- 127 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2005.09.005
Cynthia A Brewer, Linda Pickle, None, Evaluation of Methods for Classifying Epidemiological Data on Choropleth Maps in Series Annals of The Association of American Geographers. ,vol. 92, pp. 662- 681 ,(2002) , 10.1111/1467-8306.00310
Jakob Zinsstag, Esther Schelling, Felix Roth, Bassirou Bonfoh, Don de Savigny, Marcel Tanner, Human Benefits of Animal Interventions for Zoonosis Control Emerging Infectious Diseases. ,vol. 13, pp. 527- 531 ,(2007) , 10.3201/EID1304.060381
A.C.A Clements, D.U Pfeiffer, M.J Otte, K Morteo, L Chen, A global livestock production and health atlas (GLiPHA) for interactive presentation, integration and analysis of livestock data Preventive Veterinary Medicine. ,vol. 56, pp. 19- 32 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0167-5877(02)00121-6
William L Bland, Estimating spatial cattle and swine inventories from limited data Agricultural Systems. ,vol. 73, pp. 165- 172 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00080-4