Embryonic Modulation of Endometrial Receptivity
作者： Sakae Goto
DOI: 10.1274/JMOR.35.53
关键词: Embryo 、 Pregnancy 、 Embryo transfer 、 Blastocyst 、 Andrology 、 Embryonic stem cell 、 Blastocyst Transfer 、 Biology 、 Embryo culture 、 Endometrium
摘要: Implantation requires a receptive endometrium, functionally normal embryo and communication between the developing maternal tissues (cross-talk). Two-step transfer (two-step ET) stimulation of endometrium (SEET) are procedures for ET based on concept embryonic modulation endometrial receptivity. In two-step ET, cleaved is transferred day 2, blastocyst 5. The pregnancy implantation rates with were found to be higher than those double transfer. We speculated that embryos 2 modulate receptivity improve rate blastocysts SEET, culture supernatant (ECS) injected into uterine cavity prior stimulate provide an optimum environment forthcoming blastocysts. SEET Higher could explained by factors produced in medium Lysophosphatidic acid was detected ECS. effective options crosstalk tissues.
sci-hub.st 参考文章(33)
P Drakakis, L Michalas, A Asteriou-Dionyssiou, N Doumplis, K Dallianidis, S Milingos, D Loutradis, S R Bletsa, N Sofikitis, S Michalas, A double embryo transfer on days 2 and 4 or 5 improves pregnancy outcome in patients with good embryos but repeated failures in IVF or ICSI. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 31, pp. 63- 66 ,(2004)
CARLOS SIMÓN, FRANCISCO DOMINGUEZ, JOSÉ REMOHÍ, ANTONIO PELLICER, Embryo Effects in Human Implantation Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. ,vol. 943, pp. 1- 16 ,(2001) , 10.1111/J.1749-6632.2001.TB03785.X
Michael C.W. Scholtes, Gerard H. Zeilmaker, Blastocyst transfer in day-5 embryo transfer depends primarily on the number of oocytes retrieved and not on age Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 69, pp. 78- 83 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00450-0
Amin A Milki, Jeffrey D Fisch, Barry Behr, Two-blastocyst transfer has similar pregnancy rates and a decreased multiple gestation rate compared with three-blastocyst transfer. Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 72, pp. 225- 228 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00262-9
Yannis Prapas, Stamatios Petousis, Yannis Panagiotidis, Giuseppe Gullo, Lia Kasapi, Achilleas Papadeothodorou, Nikos Prapas, Injection of embryo culture supernatant to the endometrial cavity does not affect outcomes in IVF/ICSI or oocyte donation cycles: a randomized clinical trial. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. ,vol. 162, pp. 169- 173 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.EJOGRB.2012.03.003
Sakae Goto, Takashi Kadowaki, Hiromi Hashimoto, Shoji Kokeguchi, Masahide Shiotani, Stimulation of endometrium embryo transfer (SEET): injection of embryo culture supernatant into the uterine cavity before blastocyst transfer can improve implantation and pregnancy rates Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 88, pp. 1339- 1343 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2007.01.011
P. Licht, V. Russu, L. Wildt, On the role of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the embryo-endometrial microenvironment: implications for differentiation and implantation Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. ,vol. 19, pp. 37- 47 ,(2001) , 10.1055/S-2001-13909
M.L. Polan, C. Simon, A. Frances, B.Y. Lee, L.E. Prichard, Role of embryonic factors in human implantation Human Reproduction. ,vol. 10, pp. 22- 29 ,(1995) , 10.1093/HUMREP/10.SUPPL_2.22
E Wolf, GJ Arnold, S Bauersachs, HM Beier, H Blum, R Einspanier, T Fröhlich, A Herrler, S Hiendleder, S Kölle, K Prelle, H-D Reichenbach, M Stojkovic, H Wenigerkind, F Sinowatz, Embryo-Maternal Communication in Bovine – Strategies for Deciphering a Complex Cross-Talk Reproduction in Domestic Animals. ,vol. 38, pp. 276- 289 ,(2003) , 10.1046/J.1439-0531.2003.00435.X
Ensieh Shahrokhe Tehraninejad, Fateme Davari Tanha, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh, Zahra Zandieh, Elham Aziminekoo, Haleh Rahmanpour Zanjani, Stimulation of the endometrium with high-grade blastocyst culture supernatant (SEHB) can improve pregnancy outcome for couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): a randomized clinical trial. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. ,vol. 285, pp. 1167- 1171 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00404-011-2143-Z