Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Prostate Cancer at 3 T: A Study of Pharmacokinetic Parameters
作者： Iclal Ocak , Marcelino Bernardo , Greg Metzger , Tristan Barrett , Peter Pinto
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.1329
关键词: Radiology 、 Predictive value 、 Prospective cohort study 、 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI 、 Prostate cancer 、 Endorectal coil 、 Prostate 、 Biopsy 、 Medicine 、 Pharmacokinetics
摘要: OBJECTIVE. The objectives of our study were to determine whether dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI performed at 3 T and analyzed using a pharmacokinetic model improves the diagnostic performance for detection prostate cancer compared with conventional T2-weighted imaging, which parameters are useful in diagnosing cancer.SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This prospective included 50 consecutive patients biopsy-proven who underwent imaging on 3-T scanner combination sensitivity-encoding (SENSE) cardiac coil an endorectal coil. Scans obtained least 5 weeks after biopsy. turbo spin-echo images three planes, acquired during single-dose bolus injection gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative (NPV) estimated c...
sci-hub.se 参考文章(47)
A. Jemal, R. Siegel, E. Ward, T. Murray, J. Xu, C. Smigal, M. J. Thun, Cancer statistics, 2006. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. ,vol. 56, pp. 106- 130 ,(2006) , 10.3322/CANJCLIN.56.2.106
H Ito, K Kamoi, K Yokoyama, K Yamada, T Nishimura, Visualization of prostate cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with transrectal power Doppler ultrasound British Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 76, pp. 617- 624 ,(2003) , 10.1259/BJR/52526261
Chan Kyo Kim, Byung Kwan Park, Bohyun Kim, Localization of prostate cancer using 3T MRI: comparison of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. ,vol. 30, pp. 7- 11 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01.RCT.0000185384.27765.09
L E Quint, J S Van Erp, P H Bland, S H Mandell, E A Del Buono, H B Grossman, G M Glazer, P W Gikas, Carcinoma of the prostate: MR images obtained with body coils do not accurately reflect tumor volume. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 156, pp. 511- 516 ,(1991) , 10.2214/AJR.156.3.1899746
Hong Li, Kazuro Sugimura, Yasushi Kaji, Yuri Kitamura, Masahiko Fujii, Isao Hara, Mayumi Tachibana, Conventional MRI capabilities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in the transition zone. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 186, pp. 729- 742 ,(2006) , 10.2214/AJR.04.0775
Lindsay W. Turnbull, Adrian J. Knowles, Gary P. Liney, In vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy and dynamic contrast enhanced imaging of the prostate gland. NMR in Biomedicine. ,vol. 12, pp. 39- 44 ,(1999) , 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199902)12:1<39::AID-NBM543>3.0.CO;2-1
Michael V. Knopp, Frederik L. Giesel, Hani Marcos, Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk, Peter Choyke, Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology. Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ,vol. 12, pp. 301- 308 ,(2001) , 10.1097/00002142-200108000-00006
A.E. WEFER, H. HRICAK, D.B. VIGNERON, F.V. COAKLEY, Y. LU, J. WEFER, U. MUELLER-LISSE, P.R. CARROLL, J. KURHANEWICZ, SEXTANT LOCALIZATION OF PROSTATE CANCER: COMPARISON OF SEXTANT BIOPSY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPIC IMAGING WITH STEP SECTION HISTOLOGY The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 164, pp. 400- 404 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67370-3
Michael K. Brawer, Robert E. Deering, Marianne Brown, Steven D. Preston, Steven A. Bigler, Predictors of pathologic stage in prostatic carcinoma. The role of neovascularity. Cancer. ,vol. 73, pp. 678- 687 ,(1994) , 10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:3<678::AID-CNCR2820730329>3.0.CO;2-6
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Jonas Merkle, Rainer Grobholz, Tim Jaeger, Maurice Stephan Michel, Axel Werner, Jan Rabe, Gerhard van Kaick, Can pre-operative contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for prostate cancer predict microvessel density in prostatectomy specimens? European Radiology. ,vol. 14, pp. 309- 317 ,(2004) , 10.1007/S00330-003-2025-2