Los Estudios de la Dis/capacidad: una propuesta no individualizante para interrogar críticamente la producción del cuerpo-sujeto discapacitado

作者: Laura Sanmiquel-Molinero

DOI: 10.1387/PCEIC.20974

关键词: Research questionsAbleismSociologyEpistemologyPosthumanismQualitative researchDifferentiation

摘要: This paper aims to promote the dialogue between Spanish and Anglo-Saxon perspectives that are critical of individual models disability. Also, seeks bridge these approaches qualitative research. Specifically, I claim Dis/ability Studies (D/aS) a well-suited approach ground this field inquiry. emergent perspective explores "dis/ability complex" from an intersectional stance. That is, way in which attributes linked ability disability mutually constitutive, simultaneously reproduced by disablism ableism as well other systems social differentiation. work advances twelve research questions derive D/aS two their theoretical foundations (poststructuralism postconventionalism). Drawing on poststructuralism, conceptualise foucaultian apparatus ableist regime intelligibility is shaped On hand, postconventional theories such posthumanism affect allow us explore material affective assemblages corporealise disabled subject, reproducing and/or subverting apparatus. conclude pointing out ‘ableism’ ‘disablism’ can further debate activist fields beyond ‘disability’.

参考文章(33)
Assumpció Pié Balaguer, Carme Riu i Pascual, Violencia, mujer y diversidad funcional : la vulnerabilidad aumentada Educación social : revista de intervención socioeducativa. pp. 41- 60 ,(2014)
Jemima Repo, The Life Function: The Biopolitics of Sexuality and Race Revisited Theory and Event. ,vol. 16, ,(2013)
Vivian M. May, Beth A. Ferri, Fixated on Ability Prose Studies. ,vol. 27, pp. 120- 140 ,(2005) , 10.1080/01440350500068999
Alejandro Martín Contino, El dispositivo de discapacidad Tesis psicológica: Revista de la Facultad de Psicología. ,vol. 8, pp. 174- 183 ,(2013)
Carol Thomas, Disability and Gender: Reflections on Theory and Research Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. ,vol. 8, pp. 177- 185 ,(2006) , 10.1080/15017410600731368