Break on through to the other side : the effectiveness of game fencing to mitigate human-wildlife conflict
作者： M. Kristina Kesch , Dominik T. Bauer , Andrew J. Loveridge
DOI: 10.3957/056.045.0109
关键词: Dry season 、 Fence (finance) 、 Digging 、 Wildlife 、 National park 、 Fencing 、 Fishery 、 Wet season 、 Forestry 、 Human–wildlife conflict 、 Geography
摘要: Game fences are widely used to mitigate human–wildlife conflict and, where fencing is deemed the right choice, appropriate design, alignment and maintenance keys effectiveness. We studied effectiveness of Makgadikgadi Pans National Park game fence along Boteti River in central Botswana, one highest areas country, using a spoor survey method counting holes made by transgressing animals. investigated fence’s separating humans wildlife, as evidenced transgression frequencies different hole-digging species. Since prevents access long stretches river national park boundary, transgressions for lions (Panthera leo), elephants (Loxodonta africana) all digging species were higher during dry season when there was no surface water available park. Conversely, cattle (Bos taurus Bos indicus) crossed moved into high numbers rainy season, probably grazing. Wildlife damage without implementation prompt constant repair, such cannot be effective alleviating conflict.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(27)
Glyn Maude, The Comparative Ecology of the Brown Hyaena (Hyaena brunnea) in Makgadikgadi National Park and a Neighbouring Community Cattle Area in Botswana University of Pretoria. ,(2007)
Ken Ferguson, Laura Adam, Ferran Jori, An Adaptive Monitoring Programme for Studying Impacts Along the Western Boundary Fence of Kruger National Park, South Africa Fencing for conservation : restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes?. pp. 105- 123 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1_7
Michelle E. Gadd, Barriers, the Beef Industry and Unnatural Selection: A Review of the Impact of Veterinary Fencing on Mammals in Southern Africa Springer, New York, NY. pp. 153- 186 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1_9
Rob Slotow, Fencing for Purpose: A Case Study of Elephants in South Africa Springer, New York, NY. pp. 91- 104 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1_6
Harriet T. Davies-Mostert, M. Gus L. Mills, David W. Macdonald, A Critical Assessment of South Africa's Managed Metapopulation Recovery Strategy for African Wild Dogs John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 10- 42 ,(2009) , 10.1002/9781444312034.CH2
Urs Breitenmoser, Christof Angst, Jean-Marc Landry, Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten, John D. C. Linnell, Jean-Marc Weber, People and Wildlife: Non-lethal techniques for reducing depredation Cambridge University Press. pp. 49- 71 ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511614774.005
Richard Frankham, Genetic considerations in reintroduction programmes for top-order, terrestrial predators Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 371- 387 ,(2009) , 10.1002/9781444312034.CH17
M. Trinkel, P. Funston, M. Hofmeyr, D. Hofmeyr, S. Dell, C. Packer, R. Slotow, Inbreeding and density-dependent population growth in a small, isolated lion population Animal Conservation. ,vol. 13, pp. 374- 382 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1469-1795.2009.00344.X
Michael J Somers, Matthew W Hayward, Fencing for conservation: Restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes? Biological Conservation. ,vol. 142, pp. 1- 13 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2008.09.022
M. Trinkel, N. Ferguson, A. Reid, C. Reid, M. Somers, L. Turelli, J. Graf, M. Szykman, D. Cooper, P. Haverman, G. Kastberger, C. Packer, R. Slotow, Translocating lions into an inbred lion population in the Hluhluwe‐iMfolozi Park, South Africa Animal Conservation. ,vol. 11, pp. 138- 143 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1469-1795.2008.00163.X