Differences in eDemocracy parties' eParticipation systems
作者： Ovid Pacific Boyd
DOI: 10.3233/IP-2008-0161
关键词: Politics 、 Ontology (information science) 、 Variety (cybernetics) 、 Public relations 、 Direct democracy 、 Sociology 、 Process (engineering) 、 Deliberative democracy 、 Diversity (politics) 、 Emerging technologies 、 Sociology and Political Science 、 Communication 、 Public administration 、 Information Systems
摘要: eDemocracy political parties are an emerging and radically new form of party that enables citizen participation in the policy-making process using ICTs. This paper compares eParticipation systems four first (Senator On-Line, Knivsta.Now, Aktiv Demokrati Demoex) ontology describes according to 1) stages policy-making, 2) levels engagement, 3) stakeholders, 4) areas, 5) tools 6) technologies. By applying this a great diversity among parties' was discovered. Two overall categories, proxy politician deliberative community systems, created label current variety systems. However, even within these labels there substantial differences several subtypes suggested: individualistic citizen-review delegated-leaders Additionally, multi-channel system may be system.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(6)
Colin F Smith, Karl Löfgren, Political parties and democracy in the information age. Routledge. ,(2003)
John Haskell, Direct Democracy Or Representative Government? Dispelling The Populist Myth ,(2000)
Irene M. Hall, D. J. Hall, Jo Campling, Practical Social Research: Project Work in the Community ,(1996)
Rachel Kay Gibson, P. G. Nixon, Stephen Ward, Political Parties and the Internet: Net Gain? ,(2003)
Maria A. Wimmer, Ontology for an e-participation virtual resource centre Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance - ICEGOV '07. pp. 89- 98 ,(2007) , 10.1145/1328057.1328079
Ian Budge, The new challenge of direct democracy ,(1996)