Interest of cervical ripening using double balloon catheters for labour induction in term nulliparous women
作者： Camille Sulkowski , Floriane Schneider , Vincent Tessier , Olivier Toullalan , Amélie Grouin
DOI: 10.1016/J.JOGOH.2019.05.004
关键词: Balloon 、 Labour Induction 、 Labor induction 、 Balloon catheter 、 Vaginal delivery 、 Medicine 、 Bishop score 、 Ripening 、 Total dose 、 Obstetrics
摘要: Abstract Objective: To compare the efficiency of double balloon catheters with that intravaginal prostaglandins alone for labor induction unfavourable cervices in term nulliparous women. Methods: 50 patients induced a device were compared to 53 using alone. The main outcome measure was labour failure, characterized by absence active labour. secondary measures improvement Bishop score, average durations ripening and induction, time labour, need second cervical agent, total dose used each group, use oxytocins, as well rates vaginal delivery, abnormal foetal heart rate during perinatal maternal infection. Results: failed 28% against 13% group. higher score significantly lower Discussion conclusion: In our study, does not seem reduce women when addition, it could lengthen duration, although more powerful studies would be necessary recommend its
elsevier.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(10)
F.M Reis, M.T Gervasi, P Florio, G Bracalente, M Fadalti, F.M Severi, F Petraglia, Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 189, pp. 1361- 1367 ,(2003) , 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00725-7
Jack Atad, Mordechai Hallak, Yehuda Ben-David, Ron Auslender, Haim Abramovici, Ripening and dilatation of the unfavourable cervix for induction of labour by a double balloon device: experience with 250 cases British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 104, pp. 29- 32 ,(1997) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1997.TB10644.X
CE Pennell, JJ Henderson, MJ O’Neill, S McCleery, DA Doherty, JE Dickinson, Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 116, pp. 1443- 1452 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2009.02279.X
Antonella Cromi, Fabio Ghezzi, Stefano Uccella, Massimo Agosti, Maurizio Serati, Giulia Marchitelli, Pierfrancesco Bolis, A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 207, pp. 125- ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2012.05.020
Marta Jozwiak, Katrien Oude Rengerink, Marjan Benthem, Erik Van Beek, Marja GK Dijksterhuis, Irene M De Graaf, Marloes E Van Huizen, Martijn A Oudijk, Dimitri NM Papatsonis, Denise AM Perquin, Martina Porath, Joris AM Van Der Post, Robbert JP Rijnders, Hubertina CJ Scheepers, Marc EA Spaanderman, Maria G Van Pampus, Jan Willem De Leeuw, Ben WJ Mol, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, None, Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial The Lancet. ,vol. 378, pp. 2095- 2103 ,(2011) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61484-0
Antonella Cromi, Fabio Ghezzi, Massimo Agosti, Maurizio Serati, Stefano Uccella, Veronica Arlant, Pierfrancesco Bolis, Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 204, pp. 338.e1- 338.e7 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2010.11.029
E H Bishop, PELVIC SCORING FOR ELECTIVE INDUCTION. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 24, pp. 266- 268 ,(1964)
Kristen McMaster, Luis Sanchez-Ramos, Andrew M. Kaunitz, Evaluation of a Transcervical Foley Catheter as a Source of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 126, pp. 539- 551 ,(2015) , 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001002
C. Boyon, N. Monsarrat, E. Clouqueur, P. Deruelle, Maturation cervicale : y a-t-il un avantage à utiliser un double ballonnet pour le déclenchement du travail ? Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. ,vol. 42, pp. 674- 680 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.GYOBFE.2014.07.035
D B Peisner, M G Rosen, Transition from latent to active labor. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 68, pp. 448- 451 ,(1986)