Load-bearing capacity and failure types of premolars restored with sonic activated bulk-fill-, nano-hybrid and silorane-based resin restorative materials
作者： Funda Öztürk-Bozkurt , Tugba Toz-Akalin , Burcu Gözetici , Mahmut Kusdemir , Alev Özsoy
DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2016.1168340
关键词: Adhesive 、 Nano hybrid 、 Materials science 、 Compressive load 、 Composite material 、 Clearfil SE Bond 、 Bulk fill 、 Resin composite 、 Load bearing 、 Composite number
摘要: AbstractThis study evaluated the load-bearing capacity of premolars restored with three types resin composite materials in mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities. Extracted human (N = 30, n = 10 per group) were randomly divided into groups; MOD cavities prepared and one following materials: Group BFC: Bulk-fill (SonicFill, Kerr Corporation), NC: Nanohybrid (Filtek Z550, 3M ESPE), SC: Silorane-based Silorane, ESPE). For NC Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Japan) for SC, Silorane adhesive System Adhesive, ESPE) used. The SC groups incrementally, while those BFC bulk. After water storage (24 h, 37 °C), each tooth was subjected to compressive loading a stainless steel ball (diameter: 4 mm) perpendicular occlusal surface (1 mm/min). Failure categorized according being repairable or irrepairab...
core.ac.uk
uzh.ch
sci-hub.se 参考文章(42)
Jennifer Ann Soncini, Nancy Nairi Maserejian, Felicia Trachtenberg, Mary Tavares, Catherine Hayes, The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: Findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial Journal of the American Dental Association. ,vol. 138, pp. 763- 772 ,(2007) , 10.14219/JADA.ARCHIVE.2007.0264
M C Downer, N A Azli, R Bedi, D R Moles, D J Setchell, How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review. British Dental Journal. ,vol. 187, pp. 432- 439 ,(1999) , 10.1038/SJ.BDJ.4800298A1
Ulla Pallesen, Jan W.V. van Dijken, A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations Journal of Dentistry. ,vol. 43, pp. 1547- 1558 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JDENT.2015.09.003
Ulla Pallesen, Jan W.V. van Dijken, A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations Dental Materials. ,vol. 31, pp. 1232- 1244 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2015.08.146
Golsa Akbarian, Hamideh Ameri, Joseph E. Chasteen, Marjaneh Ghavamnasiri, Fracture Resistance of Premolar Teeth Restored with Silorane-Based or Dimethacrylate-Based Composite Resins Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. ,vol. 26, pp. 200- 207 ,(2014) , 10.1111/JERD.12060
Maryam Ghavam, Mohammad Javad Karazifard, Zhina Mirkhezri, Sedighe Sadat HashemiKamangar, Comparison of the Effects of Two Different Drinks on Microhardness of a Silorane-based Composite Resin. Journal of Dentistry. ,vol. 16, pp. 260- 266 ,(2015)
Stephano Zerlottini Isaac, Ana Claudia Pietrobom Bergamin, Cecilia Pedroso Turssi, Flavia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral, Roberta Tarkany Basting, Fabiana Mantovani Gomes Franca, Evaluation of bond strength of silorane and methacrylate based restorative systems to dentin using different cavity models Journal of Applied Oral Science. ,vol. 21, pp. 452- 459 ,(2013) , 10.1590/1679-775720130120
Paulo Vinícius Soares, Paulo César Freitas Santos-Filho, Ellyne Cavalcanti Queiroz, Thiago Caixeta Araújo, Roberto Elias Campos, Cleudmar Amaral Araújo, Carlos José Soares, Fracture Resistance and Stress Distribution in Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Composite Resin Journal of Prosthodontics. ,vol. 17, pp. 114- 119 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1532-849X.2007.00258.X
N.A. Taha, G.A. Maghaireh, R. Bagheri, A. Abu Holy, Fracture strength of root filled premolar teeth restored with silorane and methacrylate-based resin composite Journal of Dentistry. ,vol. 43, pp. 735- 741 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JDENT.2015.01.011
Jack L. Ferracane, Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict? Dental Materials. ,vol. 29, pp. 51- 58 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2012.06.013