How much can holding and/or limiting boarding improve transit performance?

作者: Felipe Delgado , Juan Carlos Munoz , Ricardo Giesen

DOI: 10.1016/J.TRB.2012.04.005

关键词: SimulationEngineeringSpeedupReliability (computer networking)Bus bunchingBenchmark (computing)HeadwayOperations researchControl (management)Load factorReal-time Control System

摘要: Abstract Bus bunching affects transit operations by increasing passenger waiting times and its variability. This work proposes a new mathematical programming model to control vehicles operating on corridor minimizing total delays. The can handle heterogeneous fleet of with different capacities without using binary variables, which make solution compatible real-time requirements. Two policies are studied within rolling horizon framework: (i) vehicle holding (HRT), be applied at any stop (ii) combined boarding limits (HBLRT), in the number passengers limited order increase operational speed. Both strategies evaluated simulation environment under conditions. results show that HBLRT HRT outperform other benchmark all scenarios, savings excess time up 77% very low variability performance. shows significant benefits relation only short headway operation high demand. Moreover, our suggest implementing when next arriving is nearby. Interestingly, these cases not reduces an extra 6.3% expected comparison HRT, but also outperforms schemes terms comfort reliability both operators. To provide more balanced load factor across yielding comfortable experience. operators use speed reducing average cycle variability, key for smooth terminals.

参考文章(22)
Aichong Sun, Mark Hickman, The Holding Problem at Multiple Holding Stations Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. ,vol. 600, pp. 339- 359 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-3-540-73312-6_17
R.H. Haveman, D.L. Weimer, Cost–Benefit Analysis International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. pp. 2845- 2851 ,(2001) , 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02239-7
Mark A Turnquist, Steven W Blume, EVALUATING POTENTIAL EFFECTIVENESS OF HEADWAY CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR TRANSIT SYSTEMS Transportation Research Record. ,(1980)
J. K. Jolliffe, T. P. Hutchinson, A Behavioural Explanation of the Association Between Bus and Passenger Arrivals at a Bus Stop Transportation Science. ,vol. 9, pp. 248- 282 ,(1975) , 10.1287/TRSC.9.3.248
Saeed Zolfaghari, Nader Azizi, Mohamad Y Jaber, None, A Model For Holding Strategy In Public Transit Systems With Real-Time Information International Journal of Transport Management. ,vol. 2, pp. 99- 110 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.IJTM.2005.02.001
Felipe Delgado, Juan Carlos Muñoz, Ricardo Giesen, Aldo Cipriano, Real-Time Control of Buses in a Transit Corridor Based on Vehicle Holding and Boarding Limits Transportation Research Record. ,vol. 2090, pp. 59- 67 ,(2009) , 10.3141/2090-07
Carlos F. Daganzo, A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching: Systematic analysis and comparisons Transportation Research Part B-methodological. ,vol. 43, pp. 913- 921 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.TRB.2009.04.002
AICHONG SUN, MARK HICKMAN, The Real–Time Stop–Skipping Problem Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems. ,vol. 9, pp. 91- 109 ,(2005) , 10.1080/15472450590934642
Mark D. Hickman, An Analytic Stochastic Model for the Transit Vehicle Holding Problem Transportation Science. ,vol. 35, pp. 215- 237 ,(2001) , 10.1287/TRSC.35.3.215.10150
John J. Bartholdi, Donald D. Eisenstein, A self-coördinating bus route to resist bus bunching Transportation Research Part B-methodological. ,vol. 46, pp. 481- 491 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.TRB.2011.11.001