Don’t think local! Scale in conservation, parochialism, dogmatic bureaucracy and the implementing of the European Directives

作者: Corrado Battisti , Giuliano Fanelli

DOI: 10.1016/J.JNC.2015.01.005

关键词: Relevance (law)Context (language use)Conceptual frameworkParochialismEnvironmental resource managementPolitical scienceEcology (disciplines)Natura 2000BureaucracyHabitat

摘要: Abstract The strictly target-based approach promoted by the European Community Directives (Bird 79/409 and 147/2009; Habitat 92/43/CE) is strategic allowing conservation of targets in real contexts (i.e. sites comprising Natura 2000 network). Nevertheless site-specific Standard Data Forms (SDFs), reporting lists (species habitat types), although often incomplete, are regularly utilized practitioners Public Agencies an uncritical bureaucratic way. We think that a lack awareness on how populations, communities ecosystems work may induce parochialism consequent ineffectiveness actions. In this commentary we would suggest some fundamental concepts ecology have strong implications procedures carried out measures, synthesizing all conceptual framework. particular, when approaching to develop should critically complete reported SDFs verifying: (i) target relevance wider context (spatial scale populations), also compared other co-occurring common species; (ii) type rarity (if deterministic or stochastic); (iii) role (per se as indicator); (iv) coherence between historical/geographic measures developed. Finally they be aware hierarchic relationships among different ecological levels interested (individuals, communities, ecosystems).

参考文章(84)
Reed F. Noss, Issues of Scale in Conservation Biology Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 239- 250 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4684-6426-9_9
Ian Burfield, Franz van Bommel, Birds in Europe : population estimates, trends and conservation status Published in <b>2004</b> in Cambridge by BirdLife international. ,(2004)
G. M. Tucker, Caroline M. Socha, Melanie F. Heath, Birds in Europe : their conservation status BirdLife International. ,(1994)
Józef Witkowski, Breeding biology and ecology of the marsh harrier Circus aeruginosus in the Barycz valley, Poland Acta Ornithologica. ,vol. 25, pp. 223- 320 ,(1989)
PEDRO CARDOSO, Habitats Directive species lists: urgent need of revision Insect Conservation and Diversity. ,vol. 5, pp. 169- 174 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1752-4598.2011.00140.X
LUIGI BOITANI, ALESSANDRA FALCUCCI, LUIGI MAIORANO, CARLO RONDININI, Ecological networks as conceptual frameworks or operational tools in conservation. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 21, pp. 1414- 1422 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2007.00828.X
Frank Wugt Larsen, Jesper Bladt, Andrew Balmford, Carsten Rahbek, Birds as biodiversity surrogates: will supplementing birds with other taxa improve effectiveness? Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 49, pp. 349- 356 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2011.02094.X
A. Cortés-Avizanda, M. Carrete, D. Serrano, J. A. Donázar, Carcasses increase the probability of predation of ground-nesting birds: a caveat regarding the conservation value of vulture restaurants Animal Conservation. ,vol. 12, pp. 85- 88 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1469-1795.2008.00231.X
Laurent Godet, Vincent Devictor, Frédéric Jiguet, Estimating relative population size included within protected areas Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 16, pp. 2587- 2598 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S10531-006-9020-2