Effectiveness of portable electronic and optical magnifiers for near vision activities in low vision: a randomised crossover trial.

作者: John J. Taylor , Rachel Bambrick , Andrew Brand , Nathan Bray , Michelle Dutton

DOI: 10.1111/OPO.12379

关键词: Activities of daily livingCrossover studyRehabilitationReading (process)Visual acuityVisual impairmentProspective cohort studyOptometryRandomized controlled trialMedicine

摘要: Purpose To compare the performance of near vision activities using additional portable electronic enhancement systems (p-EVES), to optical magnifiers alone, by individuals with visual impairment. Methods A total 100 experienced aid users were recruited from low clinics at Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK, a prospective two-arm cross-over randomised controlled trial. Reading, activities, and device usage evaluated baseline; end each study arm (Intervention A: existing aids plus p-EVES; Intervention B: only) which was after 2 4 months. Results A 82 participants completed study. Overall, maximum reading speed for high contrast sentences not statistically significantly different p-EVES, although critical print size threshold could be accessed p-EVES smaller (p < 0.001 in both cases). The used larger number tasks 0.001), more frequently 0.001). However preferred leisure 70% participants, allowed longer duration During when they had device, able carry out independently reported less difficulty range 0.001). Conclusions The provides evidence that devices can play useful role supplementing reduce activity limitation tasks.

参考文章(26)
Ronald J. Cole, Modifications to the Fletcher Central Field Test for Patients with Low Vision Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. ,vol. 102, pp. 659- 659 ,(2008) , 10.1177/0145482X0810201011
Marloes C. Burggraaff, Ruth M. A. van Nispen, Frank P. Hoeben, Dirk L. Knol, Ger H. M. B. van Rens, Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of Training in the Use of Closed-Circuit Television on Reading Performance Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 53, pp. 2142- 2150 ,(2012) , 10.1167/IOVS.11-8407
Nikolaos A. Patsopoulos, A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials Dialogues in clinical neuroscience. ,vol. 13, pp. 217- 224 ,(2011)
John Taylor, Rachel Bambrick, Michelle Dutton, Robert Harper, Barbara Ryan, Rhiannon Tudor-Edwards, Heather Waterman, Chris Whitaker, Chris Dickinson, The p-EVES study design and methodology: a randomised controlled trial to compare portable electronic vision enhancement systems (p-EVES) to optical magnifiers for near vision activities in visual impairment. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. ,vol. 34, pp. 558- 572 ,(2014) , 10.1111/OPO.12149
JOAN A. STELMACK, ROBERT W. MASSOF, Using the VA LV VFQ-48 and LV VFQ-20 in low vision rehabilitation. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 84, pp. 705- 709 ,(2007) , 10.1097/OPX.0B013E3181339F1A
GALE R. WATSON, WILLIAM DE LʼAUNE, JOAN STELMACK, JOSEPH MAINO, SHARON LONG, Gale R. Watson, National survey of the impact of low vision device use among veterans. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 74, pp. 249- 259 ,(1997) , 10.1097/00006324-199705000-00019
Chris Dickinson, Maggie Shim, The influence of manual dexterity on reading speed with a hand-held magnifier. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 48, pp. 4368- 4374 ,(2007) , 10.1167/IOVS.07-0001
Nhung Xuan Nguyen, Malte Weismann, Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski, Improvement of reading speed after providing of low vision aids in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmologica. ,vol. 87, pp. 849- 853 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1755-3768.2008.01423.X
MICHAEL D. CROSSLAND, JANET H. SILVER, Thirty years in an urban low vision clinic: changes in prescribing habits of low vision practitioners. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 82, pp. 617- 622 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.OPX.0000171336.40273.3F
Louise E. Culham, Anthony Chabra, Gary S. Rubin, Clinical performance of electronic, head-mounted, low-vision devices. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. ,vol. 24, pp. 281- 290 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1475-1313.2004.00193.X