The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping.

作者: Y. Hu , R. Eagleson , M. A. Goodale

DOI: 10.1007/S002210050720

关键词: Index fingerComputer visionPsychologyContrast (vision)GRASPObject (grammar)Artificial intelligenceKinematicsMotor controlCommunicationThumbBody movement

摘要: We examined the effect on manual prehension of introducing a 5-s delay between viewing target object and initiating grasping movement. Subjects were tested in four conditions: three involved fourth estimating its size. In main experimental condition (Open Loop Delay), subjects viewed for 300 ms, but did not initiate movement until an auditory signal was presented 5 s later. this condition, had to rely stored visual information guiding their grasp after delay. another Loop), initiated as soon appeared. both these open-loop conditions, reached out grasped without seeing hand. third (Closed hand visible throughout reach. instructed pick up across width using index finger thumb. final (Perceptual Estimation), gave estimate object's with thumb ms. all which height, length independently varied from trial trial. The results experiment indicated that reaching movements made Open-Loop Closed-Loop conditions differ any kinematic measures. contrast, when performed Delay reaches took significantly longer achieved peak velocity proportionately earlier. As well, maximum grip aperture larger. addition, affected by (the 'relevant' dimension) height. estimates Perceptual-Estimation however, reflected only width. These results, together evidence other studies, suggest motor actions use different transformations than those used 'real-time' grasping. argue drive delayed arises perceptual rather visuomotor analysis object.

参考文章(14)
L.S. Jakobson, M.A. Goodale, Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research. ,vol. 86, pp. 199- 208 ,(1991) , 10.1007/BF00231054
Melvyn A Goodale, Angela Haffenden, Frames of Reference for Perception and Action in the Human Visual System Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. ,vol. 22, pp. 161- 172 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0149-7634(97)00007-9
M. Gentilucci, E. Daprati, I. Toni, S. Chieffi, M.C. Saetti, Unconscious updating of grasp motor program. Experimental Brain Research. ,vol. 105, pp. 291- 303 ,(1995) , 10.1007/BF00240965
M.A. Goodale, L.S. Jakobson, J.M. Keillor, Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements Neuropsychologia. ,vol. 32, pp. 1159- 1178 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90100-7
Allan M. Wing, Ailie Turton, Carole Fraser, Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior. ,vol. 18, pp. 245- 260 ,(1986) , 10.1080/00222895.1986.10735380
M.S.A. Graziano, C. G. Gross, Mapping Space With Neurons Current Directions in Psychological Science. ,vol. 3, pp. 164- 167 ,(1994) , 10.1111/1467-8721.EP10770670
R.G. Marteniuk, C.L. Mackenzie, M. Jeannerod, S. Athenes, C. Dugas, Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie. ,vol. 41, pp. 365- 378 ,(1987) , 10.1037/H0084157
J. D. Connolly, M. A. Goodale, The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension Experimental Brain Research. ,vol. 125, pp. 281- 286 ,(1999) , 10.1007/S002210050684
Digby Elliott, John Madalena, The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 39, pp. 541- 559 ,(1987) , 10.1080/14640748708401802
U. Castiello, K.M.B. Bennett, G.E. Stelmach, Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size Experimental Brain Research. ,vol. 94, pp. 163- 178 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF00230479