作者: William Rosner , Richard J. Auchus , Ricardo Azziz , Patrick M. Sluss , Hershel Raff
DOI: 10.1210/JC.2006-1864
关键词: Testosterone (patch) 、 Normative 、 Statement (logic) 、 Laboratory Proficiency Testing 、 Medicine 、 Endocrinology 、 Ovid medline 、 Internal medicine 、 Position statement 、 Expert opinion 、 Standardization
摘要: Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate current state clinical assays for total and free testosterone. Participants: five participants were appointed by Council Endocrine Society charged with attaining using published data expert opinion. Evidence: Data gleaned from sources via online databases (principally PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Google Scholar), College American Pathologists, laboratory experiences participants. Consensus Process: statement an effort committee reviewed in detail each member. a late draft made specific recommendations. Conclusions: Laboratory proficiency testing should be based on ability measure accurately precisely samples containing known concentrations testosterone, not only agreement others same method. When such standardization is place, normative values ...