The effect of assessment scale and metric selection on the greenhouse gas benefits of woody biomass

作者: Christopher S. Galik , Robert C. Abt

DOI: 10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2012.04.009

关键词: Greenhouse gasBiomassEnvironmental scienceNatural resource economicsMetric (unit)Scale (chemistry)Production (economics)Balance (accounting)Assessment scaleForest management

摘要: Abstract Recent attention has focused on the net greenhouse gas (GHG) implications of using woody biomass to produce energy. In particular, a great deal controversy erupted over appropriate manner and scale at which evaluate these GHG effects. Here, we conduct comparative assessment six different scales four metric calculation techniques against backdrop common demand scenario. We balance co-firing in existing coal-fired facilities state Virginia, finding that technique do fact strongly influence yielded by this Those not include possible market effects attributable increased demand, including changes forest area, management intensity, traditional industry production, generally less-favorable balances than those do. Given potential difficulty small operators may have generating or accessing information extent effects, however, it is likely stakeholders policy makers will need accuracy comprehensiveness with reporting administrative simplicity.

参考文章(13)
James E. Smith, Linda S. Heath, Kenneth E. Skog, Richard A. Birdsey, Methods for calculating forest ecosystem and harvested carbon with standard estimates for forest types of the United States Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-343. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 216 p.. ,vol. 343, ,(2006) , 10.2737/NE-GTR-343
James E. Smith, Linda S. Heath, A model of forest floor carbon mass for United States forest types Res. Pap. NE-722. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 37 p.. ,vol. 722, ,(2002) , 10.2737/NE-RP-722
Robert C. Abt, Christopher S. Galik, Forest biomass supply for bioenergy in the southeast: evaluating assessment scale. In: McWilliams, Will; Roesch, Francis A. eds. 2012. Monitoring Across Borders: 2010 Joint Meeting of the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Symposium and the Southern Mensurationists. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-157. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 255-263.. ,vol. 157, pp. 255- 263 ,(2012)
Robert C. Abt, Karen L. Abt, Frederick W. Cubbage, Projecting southern timber supply for multiple products by subregion Forest Products Journal. ,vol. 59, pp. 7- 16 ,(2009)
G. Marland, B. Schlamadinger, Forests for Carbon Sequestration or Fossil Fuel Substitution? A Sensitivity Analysis Biomass & Bioenergy. ,vol. 13, pp. 389- 397 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00027-5
Timothy G. Foley, Daniel deB. Richter, Christopher S. Galik, Extending rotation age for carbon sequestration: A cross-protocol comparison of North American forest offsets Forest Ecology and Management. ,vol. 259, pp. 201- 209 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.FORECO.2009.10.014
D.O. Hall, H.E. Mynick, R.H. Williams, Alternative roles for biomass in coping with greenhouse warming Science & Global Security. ,vol. 2, pp. 113- 151 ,(1991) , 10.1080/08929889108426356
David N. Wear, Brian C. Murray, Federal timber restrictions, interregional spillovers, and the impact on US softwood markets Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. ,vol. 47, pp. 307- 330 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00081-0
T. D. Searchinger, S. P. Hamburg, J. Melillo, W. Chameides, P. Havlik, D. M. Kammen, G. E. Likens, R. N. Lubowski, M. Obersteiner, M. Oppenheimer, G. Philip Robertson, W. H. Schlesinger, G. David Tilman, Fixing a critical climate accounting error Science. ,vol. 326, pp. 527- 528 ,(2009) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1178797