3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR angiography of the head and neck.

作者: Mark C. DeLano , J. Kevin DeMarco

DOI: 10.1016/J.NIC.2006.03.002

关键词: MedicineParallel imagingHead and neckTime of flight mr angiographyNuclear medicineCerebral circulationMr angiographyContext (language use)

摘要: This article presents the advantages and challenges of MR angiography intracranial extracranial cerebral vasculature at 3.0 T with comparative assessment to 1.5 approaches. The physical basis for superiority is discussed in context evolving technological capabilities afforded by synergistic advent higher field scanners, improved coil design, parallel imaging. review emphasizes issues related noncontrast three-dimensional time flight circulation, contrast enhanced vasculature, carotid plaque characterization.

参考文章(73)
R Aschenbach, C Eger, S Basche, T Vogl, [Grading of carotid artery stenosis using high resolution dynamic magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Are stenoses over 70% reliably detectable?]. Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren. ,vol. 176, pp. 357- 362 ,(2004) , 10.1055/S-2004-812894
Gordon F. Gibbs, John Huston, Robert D. Brown, Matt A. Bernstein, Stephen J. Riederer, Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time-of-flight MR angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology. ,vol. 25, pp. 84- 87 ,(2004)
I. Mader, R. Strecker, J. Weber, J. Klisch, A. Berlis, S. Ziyeh, Dynamic 3D MR Angiography of Intra- and Extracranial Vascular Malformations at 3T: A Technical Note American Journal of Neuroradiology. ,vol. 26, pp. 630- 634 ,(2005)
Gasser M Hathout, Suzie M El-Saden, Michael J Duh, Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: linear regression analysis. American Journal of Neuroradiology. ,vol. 24, pp. 1747- 1756 ,(2003)
Julián Benito-León, José Escribano, Jorge Campollo, Ricardo Gesto, Juan Alvarez-Linera, Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology. ,vol. 24, pp. 1012- 1019 ,(2003)
Dwight G. Nishimura, Time-of-flight MR angiography† Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. ,vol. 14, pp. 194- 201 ,(1990) , 10.1002/MRM.1910140206
J.G. Sled, I. Levesque, A.C. Santos, S.J. Francis, S. Narayanan, S.D. Brass, D.L. Arnold, G.B. Pike, Regional variations in normal brain shown by quantitative magnetization transfer imaging Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. ,vol. 51, pp. 299- 303 ,(2004) , 10.1002/MRM.10701
A. Kampschulte, M.S. Ferguson, W.S. Kerwin, Nayak L. Polissar, B. Chu, T. Saam, T.S. Hatsukami, C. Yuan, Differentiation of Intraplaque Versus Juxtaluminal Hemorrhage/Thrombus in Advanced Human Carotid Atherosclerotic Lesions by In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation. ,vol. 110, pp. 3239- 3244 ,(2004) , 10.1161/01.CIR.0000147287.23741.9A
Winfried A. Willinek, Markus Born, Birgit Simon, Henriette J. Tschampa, Carsten Krautmacher, Jürgen Gieseke, Horst Urbach, Hans J. Textor, Hans H. Schild, Time-of-Flight MR Angiography: Comparison of 3.0-T Imaging and 1.5-T Imaging—Initial Experience Radiology. ,vol. 229, pp. 913- 920 ,(2003) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2293020782
Lee M. Mitsumori, Thomas S. Hatsukami, Marina S. Ferguson, William S. Kerwin, Jianming Cai, Chun Yuan, In vivo accuracy of multisequence MR imaging for identifying unstable fibrous caps in advanced human carotid plaques Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ,vol. 17, pp. 410- 420 ,(2003) , 10.1002/JMRI.10264