Temperature dependence of trophic interactions are driven by asymmetry of species responses and foraging strategy

作者: Anthony I. Dell , Samraat Pawar , Van M. Savage

DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12081

关键词: HabitatPredationForagingEcologyBiologyFood webClimate changeAsymmetryTrophic levelEnvironmental temperature

摘要: Summary Environmental temperature has systematic effects on rates of species interactions, primarily through its influence organismal physiology. We present a mechanistic model for the thermal response consumer–resource interactions. We focus how affects interactions via key traits – body velocity, detection distance, search rate and handling time that underlie per capita consumption rate. The is general because it applies to all foraging strategies: active-capture (both consumer resource velocity are important), sit-and-wait (resource dominates) grazing (consumer dominates). The predicts influences (either consumer, or both), which determines often consumers resources encounter each other, asymmetries in responses interacting can introduce qualitative, not just quantitative, changes dynamics. illustrate this by showing determine equilibrium population densities pairs. We test existence analysing an extensive database curves ecological 309 spanning 15 orders magnitude size from terrestrial, marine freshwater habitats. find likely be common occurrence. Overall, our study reveals importance asymmetric In particular, we identify three types asymmetries: (i) different levels performance response, (ii) (e.g. activation energies) (iii) peak optimal temperatures. Such should occur more frequently as climate species' geographical distributions phenologies altered, such previously noninteracting come into contact. By using characteristics trophic well known, size, strategy, thermy environmental temperature, framework allow accurate predictions about dependence Ultimately, integration theory models food web ecosystem dynamics useful understanding natural systems will respond current future change.

参考文章(97)
Gary G. Mittelbach, Brian J. McGill, An allometric vision and motion model to predict prey encounter rates Evolutionary Ecology Research. ,vol. 8, pp. 691- 701 ,(2006)
Guy Woodward, Jonathan P. Benstead, Oliver S. Beveridge, Julia Blanchard, Thomas Brey, Lee E. Brown, Wyatt F. Cross, Nikolai Friberg, Thomas C. Ings, Ute Jacob, Simon Jennings, Mark E. Ledger, Alexander M. Milner, Jose M. Montoya, Eoin O'Gorman, Jens M. Olesen, Owen L. Petchey, Doris E. Pichler, Daniel C. Reuman, Murray S.A. Thompson, Frank J.F. Van Veen, Gabriel Yvon-Durocher, Ecological Networks in a Changing Climate Advances in Ecological Research. ,vol. 42, pp. 71- 138 ,(2010) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-381363-3.00002-2
H. O. Portner, A. P. Farrell, Physiology and Climate Change Science. ,vol. 322, pp. 690- 692 ,(2008) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1163156
K. Kirschfeld, The Resolution of Lens and Compound Eyes Symposium Neural Principles in Vision. pp. 354- 370 ,(1976) , 10.1007/978-3-642-66432-8_19
Andrew J. Davis, Linda S. Jenkinson, John H. Lawton, Bryan Shorrocks, Simon Wood, Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming Nature. ,vol. 391, pp. 783- 786 ,(1998) , 10.1038/35842
Eric Post, Rolf O. Peterson, Nils Chr. Stenseth, Brian E. McLaren, Ecosystem consequences of wolf behavioural response to climate Nature. ,vol. 401, pp. 905- 907 ,(1999) , 10.1038/44814
Joel G. Kingsolver, The Well‐Temperatured Biologist The American Naturalist. ,vol. 174, pp. 755- 768 ,(2009) , 10.1086/648310
J. J. Tewksbury, R. B. Huey, C. A. Deutsch, Putting the Heat on Tropical Animals Science. ,vol. 320, pp. 1296- 1297 ,(2008) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1159328
J. M. K. Rip, K. S. McCann, Cross‐ecosystem differences in stability and the principle of energy flux Ecology Letters. ,vol. 14, pp. 733- 740 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1461-0248.2011.01636.X
RAYMOND B. HUEY, R.D. STEVENSON, Integrating Thermal Physiology and Ecology of Ectotherms: A Discussion of Approaches Integrative and Comparative Biology. ,vol. 19, pp. 357- 366 ,(1979) , 10.1093/ICB/19.1.357