Effects of NMDA receptor antagonists on probability discounting depend on the order of probability presentation.

作者: Justin R. Yates , Kerry A. Breitenstein , Benjamin T. Gunkel , Mallory N. Hughes , Anthony B. Johnson

DOI: 10.1016/J.PBB.2016.09.004

关键词: PharmacologyUncompetitive antagonistNMDA receptorIfenprodilReinforcementKetaminePsychologyAnesthesiaGlutamate receptorReceptorAntagonist

摘要: Abstract Risky decision making can be measured using a probability-discounting procedure, in which animals choose between small, certain reinforcer and large, uncertain reinforcer. Recent evidence has identified glutamate as mediator of risky making, blocking the N -methyl- d -aspartate (NMDA) receptor with MK-801 increases preference for Because order probabilities associated large modulate effects drugs on choice, current study determined if NMDA ligands alter probability discounting ascending descending schedules. Sixteen rats were trained procedure odds against obtaining increased (n = 8) or decreased across blocks trials. Following behavioral training, received treatments (uncompetitive antagonist; 0, 0.003, 0.01, 0.03 mg/kg), ketamine 1.0, 5.0, 10.0 mg/kg), ifenprodil (NR2B-selective non-competitive 3.0, 10.0 mg/kg). Results showed was steeper (indicating risk aversion) an schedule relative to schedule. Furthermore, MK-801, ketamine, dependent used. Specifically, highest dose each drug taking schedule, but only (0.03 mg/kg) These results show that presentation modulates making.

参考文章(63)
S Mobini, T-J Chiang, M-Y Ho, CM Bradshaw, E Szabadi, None, Effects of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement. Psychopharmacology. ,vol. 152, pp. 390- 397 ,(2000) , 10.1007/S002130000542
Jennifer R St Onge, Stan B Floresco, Dopaminergic Modulation of Risk-Based Decision Making Neuropsychopharmacology. ,vol. 34, pp. 681- 697 ,(2009) , 10.1038/NPP.2008.121
Florent Perin-Dureau, Julie Rachline, Jacques Neyton, Pierre Paoletti, Mapping the Binding Site of the Neuroprotectant Ifenprodil on NMDA Receptors The Journal of Neuroscience. ,vol. 22, pp. 5955- 5965 ,(2002) , 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-14-05955.2002
Mauro Pettorruso, Luisa De Risio, Giovanni Martinotti, Marco Di Nicola, Filippo Ruggeri, Gianluigi Conte, Massimo Di Giannantonio, Luigi Janiri, Targeting the Glutamatergic System to Treat Pathological Gambling: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives BioMed Research International. ,vol. 2014, pp. 109786- 109786 ,(2014) , 10.1155/2014/109786
Elias Robles, Perla A. Vargas, Parameters of delay discounting assessment: number of trials, effort, and sequential effects. Behavioural Processes. ,vol. 78, pp. 285- 290 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.BEPROC.2007.10.012
Parnell L Davis-MacNevin, Jordan Dekraker, Liane LaDouceur, Matthew R Holahan, Comparison of the MK-801-induced increase in non-rewarded appetitive responding with dopamine agonists and locomotor activity in rats Journal of Psychopharmacology. ,vol. 27, pp. 854- 864 ,(2013) , 10.1177/0269881113492029
Yao-Ying Ma, Peng Yu, Chang-Yong Guo, Cai-Lian Cui, Effects of ifenprodil on morphine-induced conditioned place preference and spatial learning and memory in rats. Neurochemical Research. ,vol. 36, pp. 383- 391 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S11064-010-0342-9
J. R. St. Onge, S. B. Floresco, Prefrontal Cortical Contribution to Risk-Based Decision Making Cerebral Cortex. ,vol. 20, pp. 1816- 1828 ,(2010) , 10.1093/CERCOR/BHP250
Sophie Dix, Gary Gilmour, Slavinka Potts, Janice W. Smith, Mark Tricklebank, A within-subject cognitive battery in the rat: differential effects of NMDA receptor antagonists Psychopharmacology. ,vol. 212, pp. 227- 242 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S00213-010-1945-1
M. Bortolato, S. C. Godar, M. Melis, A. Soggiu, P. Roncada, A. Casu, G. Flore, K. Chen, R. Frau, A. Urbani, M. P. Castelli, P. Devoto, J. C. Shih, NMDARs Mediate the Role of Monoamine Oxidase A in Pathological Aggression The Journal of Neuroscience. ,vol. 32, pp. 8574- 8582 ,(2012) , 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0225-12.2012