Northern harriers on feeding territories respond more aggressively to neighbors than to floaters

作者: EthanJ. Temeles

DOI: 10.1007/BF00174025

关键词: Social relationBiologyRelative magnitudeAnimal ecologyDemographic economicsIntrusion

摘要: Territory owners often respond less aggressively towards intruding neighbors than floaters, an observation termed “the dear enemy phenomenon.” Comparisons of territory owners' responses to versus their floaters usually have been made for multi-purpose and/or breeding territories. Here, I describe female northern harriers Circus cyaneus (owners) on winter feeding territories three types intruders (female neighbors, and male floaters) show that the phenomenon does not occur. Owners' were more intense (mostly flights rather calls) which in turn floaters. The greater intensity compared may be related differences threat posed by each intruder terms fighting ability (RHP) potential losses from intrusion. Hence, whether or is observed, depend upon relative magnitude presented

参考文章(26)
Stephen H. Jenkins, Food selection by beavers : A multidimensional contingency table analysis. Oecologia. ,vol. 21, pp. 157- 173 ,(1975) , 10.1007/BF00345558
M. B. Brown, Wilfrid Joseph Dixon, BMDP statistical software University of California Press. ,(1983)
John Maynard Smith, Evolution and the Theory of Games ,(1982)
J. R. Krebs, Habituation and song repertoires in the great tit Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. ,vol. 1, pp. 215- 227 ,(1976) , 10.1007/BF00299198
John R. Krebs, Territorial defence in the great tit (Parus major): Do residents always win? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. ,vol. 11, pp. 185- 194 ,(1982) , 10.1007/BF00300061
Stephen E. Fienberg, The Analysis of Multidimensional Contingency Tables Ecology. ,vol. 51, pp. 419- 433 ,(1970) , 10.2307/1935377
Susan E. Riechert, Games spiders play: Behavioral variability in territorial disputes Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. ,vol. 3, pp. 135- 162 ,(1978) , 10.1007/BF00294986
Thomas Getty, Are dear enemies in a war of attrition Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 37, pp. 337- 339 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0003-3472(89)90125-5