Being relevant: Practical guidance for early career researchers interested in solving conservation problems

作者: J.M. Chapman , D. Algera , M. Dick , E.E. Hawkins , M.J. Lawrence

DOI: 10.1016/J.GECCO.2015.07.013

关键词: Context (language use)Relevance (law)Conservation psychologySociologyWork (electrical)Engineering ethicsCitizen scienceProcess (engineering)Asset (economics)Status quo

摘要: Abstract In a human-altered world where biodiversity is in decline and conservation problems abound, there dire need to ensure that the next generation of scientists have knowledge, skills, training address these problems. So called “early career researchers” (ECRs) science many challenges before them it clear status quo must change bridge knowledge–action divide. Here we identify thirteen practical strategies ECRs can employ become more relevant. this context, “relevance” refers ability contribute solving through engagement with practitioners, policy makers, stakeholders. Conservation outlined article include following: thinking ‘big picture’ during projects; embracing various forms knowledge; maintaining positive relationships locals familiar issue; accepting failure as viable (and potentially valuable) outcome; daring be creative; citizen science; incorporating interdisciplinarity; promoting practicing pro-environmental behaviours; understanding financial aspects conservation; forming collaboration from onset project; limits technology; ongoing effective networking; finally, outlook by focusing on sharing success stories. These move beyond generic highlight importance continuing an open mind throughout entire process, establishing one’s self asset interdisciplinary work, striving push for professional personal connections strengthen objectives.

参考文章(143)
Grant Gilchrist, Mark L. Mallory, Comparing Expert-Based Science With Local Ecological Knowledge: What Are We Afraid Of? Ecology and Society. ,vol. 12, ,(2007) , 10.5751/ES-01972-1201R01
Graham Whitelaw, Hague Vaughan, Brian Craig, David Atkinson, Establishing the Canadian Community Monitoring Network. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. ,vol. 88, pp. 409- 418 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1025545813057
Terry Louise Root, Stephen Henry Schneider, Wildlife Responses to Climate Change: North American Case Studies ,(2001)
David W. Gibbons, Jeremy D. Wilson, Rhys E. Green, Using conservation science to solve conservation problems Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 48, pp. 505- 508 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2011.01997.X
Grant Gilchrist, Mark Mallory, Flemming Merkel, Can Local Ecological Knowledge Contribute to Wildlife Management? Case Studies of Migratory Birds Ecology and Society. ,vol. 10, ,(2005) , 10.5751/ES-01275-100120
Ronald D. Brunner, Tim W. Clark, A Practice-based Approach to Ecosystem Management Conservation Biology. ,vol. 11, pp. 48- 58 ,(1997) , 10.1046/J.1523-1739.1997.96005.X
Christopher B. Barrett, Erwin H. Bulte, Paul Ferraro, Sven Wunder, Economic instruments for nature conservation Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2. pp. 59- 73 ,(2013) , 10.1002/9781118520178.CH4
Allan H. Burbidge, Martine Maron, Michael F. Clarke, Jack Baker, Damon L. Oliver, Greg Ford, Linking science and practice in ecological research and management: how can we do it better? Ecological Management and Restoration. ,vol. 12, pp. 54- 60 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1442-8903.2011.00569.X
E.C.M. PARSONS, D.S. SHIFFMAN, E.S. DARLING, N. SPILLMAN, A.J. WRIGHT, How Twitter literacy can benefit conservation scientists. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 28, pp. 299- 301 ,(2014) , 10.1111/COBI.12226