In vitro pharmacodynamics of fosfomycin against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

作者: Clare C. Walsh , Michelle P. McIntosh , Anton Y. Peleg , Carl M. Kirkpatrick , Phillip J. Bergen

DOI: 10.1093/JAC/DKV221

关键词: PopulationDrug resistanceCombination therapyBiologyCystic fibrosisPharmacodynamicsFosfomycinPseudomonas aeruginosaMicrobiologyIn vitro

摘要: Background The use of fosfomycin for treatment systemic infections due to MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa is increasing. However, pharmacodynamic data are limited. Methods Sixty-four clinical isolates P. (MDR and non-MDR) from two Australian hospitals were collected; 59 patients with cystic fibrosis 5 critically ill patients. in vitro properties (disodium) investigated via MICs (all isolates) and, selected isolates, time-kill kinetics (static dynamic models; concentration range, 1-1024 mg/L), population analysis profiles (PAPs) post-antibiotic effect (PAE). Two inocula (∼10(6) ∼10(8) cfu/mL) included static studies examine the on bacterial killing. Results ranged 1 >512 mg/L, 61% considered susceptible (MIC ≤64 mg/L). MIC distributions non-MDR similar. Baseline PAPs indicated heteroresistance all tested. Time-kill showed moderate (maximum killing ∼3 log10 cfu/mL), time-dependent at low inoculum regrowth 24 h. Most concentrations resulted complete replacement fosfomycin-susceptible colonies by fosfomycin-resistant colonies. Bacterial was virtually eliminated high inoculum. PAE 0.3 5.5 Conclusions These suggest monotherapy may be problematic caused aeruginosa. Further investigation combination therapy warranted.

参考文章(55)
S. T. Hakim, M. Saleem, S. A. Qasmi, S. G. Nadeem, F. Afaque, Comparison of the in vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a local hospital setting in Karachi, Pakistan. British Journal of Medical Practitioners. ,vol. 2, pp. 35- 39 ,(2009)
V. Chayakul, T. Hortiwakul, P. Chayakul, N. Ingviya, In Vitro Activity of Colistin, Fosfomycin, and Piperacillin/tazobactam Against Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Songklanagarind Hospital, Thailand Journal of Infectious Diseases and Antimicrobial Agents. ,vol. 26, pp. 91- 96 ,(2009)
R. Raz, Fosfomycin: an old--new antibiotic Clinical Microbiology and Infection. ,vol. 18, pp. 4- 7 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1469-0691.2011.03636.X
James A Driscoll, Steven L Brody, Marin H Kollef, The Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections Drugs. ,vol. 67, pp. 351- 368 ,(2007) , 10.2165/00003495-200767030-00003
Frederick M. Kahan, Jean S. Kahan, Patrick J. Cassidy, Helmut Kropp, THE MECHANISM OF ACTION OF FOSFOMYCIN (PHOSPHONOMYCIN) Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. ,vol. 235, pp. 364- 386 ,(1974) , 10.1111/J.1749-6632.1974.TB43277.X
Phillip J. Bergen, Jurgen B. Bulitta, Alan Forrest, Brian T. Tsuji, Jian Li, Roger L. Nation, Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Investigation of Colistin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using an In Vitro Model Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. ,vol. 54, pp. 3783- 3789 ,(2010) , 10.1128/AAC.00903-09
Phillip J. Bergen, Zackery P. Bulman, Sarith Saju, Juergen B. Bulitta, Cornelia Landersdorfer, Alan Forrest, Jian Li, Roger L. Nation, Brian T. Tsuji, Polymyxin Combinations: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Rationale Use Pharmacotherapy. ,vol. 35, pp. 34- 42 ,(2015) , 10.1002/PHAR.1537
Matthew E. Falagas, Sofia Maraki, Drosos E. Karageorgopoulos, Antonia C. Kastoris, Emmanuel Mavromanolakis, George Samonis, Antimicrobial susceptibility of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Enterobacteriaceae isolates to fosfomycin. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. ,vol. 35, pp. 240- 243 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.IJANTIMICAG.2009.10.019
M. Popovic, D. Steinort, S. Pillai, C. Joukhadar, Fosfomycin: an old, new friend? European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. ,vol. 29, pp. 127- 142 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S10096-009-0833-2