Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy With the Use of 3-mm Instruments and Laparoscope: Initial Experience at a Tertiary Center
作者： Alberto Breda , Juan Manuel Villamizar , Oscar Rodriguez Faba , Claudia Caliolo , Armando de Gracia
DOI: 10.1016/J.EURURO.2011.11.038
关键词: Laparoscopy 、 Standard of care 、 Surgery 、 Needlescopic surgery 、 Medicine 、 Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy 、 Live donor nephrectomy 、 Invasive surgery 、 Population
摘要: Abstract Laparoscopy has become the standard of care for kidney recovery during live donor nephrectomy (LDN) because well-documented better outcomes minimally invasive surgery compared with open approach [1–4]. Especially in population, cosmetic results are great importance; therefore, an effort to reduce incision size should be attempted while maintaining safe general principles surgery. We present our initial experience use 3-mm instruments laparoscopic LDN.
elsevier.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(24)
A Garcia-Ruiz, M Gagner, Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments. Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy. ,vol. 8, pp. 171- 179 ,(1998)
JH Kaouk, G Spana, SP Hillyer, MA White, G‐P Haber, D Goldfarb, None, Robotic‐Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for a 7‐cm Mass in a Renal Allograft American Journal of Transplantation. ,vol. 11, pp. 2242- 2246 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1600-6143.2011.03655.X
Nasser Simforoosh, Abbas Basiri, Ali Tabibi, Nasser Shakhssalim, Seyed M.M. Hosseini Moghaddam, Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BJUI. ,vol. 95, pp. 851- 855 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2005.05415.X
John S Lam, Alberto Breda, Peter G Schulam, Is laparoscopic donor nephrectomy the new standard Nature Clinical Practice Urology. ,vol. 4, pp. 186- 187 ,(2007) , 10.1038/NCPURO0755
M. Musquera, L. Peri, L. Izquierdo, P. Campillo, M.J. Ribal, A. Alcaraz, Pioneer experience in Spain with LESS nephrectomy in living donor Actas Urologicas Espanolas. ,vol. 35, pp. 559- 562 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.ACUROE.2011.12.005
Y.H. Park, S.K. Min, J.N. Lee, H.H. Lee, W.K. Jung, J.S. Lee, J.H. Lee, Y.D. Lee, Comparison of survival probabilities for living-unrelated versus cadaveric renal transplant recipients Congress of the Asian Society of Transplantation (CAST). ,vol. 36, pp. 2020- 2022 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.TRANSPROCEED.2004.08.122
Andrew D. Wright, Thomas A. Will, David R. Holt, Thomas M.T. Turk, Kent T. Perry, Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Look at Current Trends and Practice Patterns at Major Transplant Centers Across the United States Journal of Urology. ,vol. 179, pp. 1488- 1492 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2007.11.066
David Canes, Andre Berger, Monish Aron, Ricardo Brandina, David A Goldfarb, Daniel Shoskes, Mihir M Desai, Inderbir S Gill, None, Laparo-Endoscopic Single Site (LESS) versus Standard Laparoscopic Left Donor Nephrectomy: Matched-pair Comparison European Urology. ,vol. 57, pp. 95- 101 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2009.07.023
Alberto Breda, Matthew H. Bui, Joseph C. Liao, Peter G. Schulam, Association of bowel rest and ketorolac analgesia with short hospital stay after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology. ,vol. 69, pp. 828- 831 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2007.01.083
Antonio Alcaraz, Mireia Musquera, Lluis Peri, Laura Izquierdo, Eduard García-Cruz, Jorge Huguet, Ricardo Álvarez-Vijande, Josep M. Campistol, Federico Oppenheimer, Maria J. Ribal, Feasibility of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery–Assisted Living Donor Nephrectomy: Is Kidney Vaginal Delivery the Approach of the Future? European Urology. ,vol. 59, pp. 1019- 1025 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2011.03.021