Does It Pay to Plead Guilty? Differential Sentencing and the Functioning of Criminal Courts

作者: David Brereton , Jonathan D. Casper

DOI: 10.2307/3053549

关键词: SentenceDifferential (mechanical device)GotoProcess (engineering)PsychologyAssertionWork (electrical)Law and economicsDispositionSociology and Political ScienceLaw

摘要: Do defendants who plead guilty receive lighter sentences than those with similar charges and attributes exercise their right to trial? The assertion that they do has long been at the heart of literature describing explaining plea-bargaining process, though it questioned in some important work published recently. existence sentence differentials is particularly hard document statistically, because a successfully operating policy punishing go trial will fact minimize number cases which sanction for be imposed. Examination data from three California counties, as well consideration various theoretical concerns, leads us argue are likely characterize jurisdictions whose disposition patterns based on inducing most guilty.

参考文章(19)
Donald J. Newman, Pleading Guilty for Considerations: A Study of Bargain Justice Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. ,vol. 46, pp. 780- ,(1956) , 10.2307/1139978
Albert W. Alschuler, The Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining University of Chicago Law Review. ,vol. 36, pp. 50- ,(1968) , 10.2307/1598832
Milton Heumann, Colin Loftin, Mandatory Sentencing and the Abolition of Plea Bargaining: The Michigan Felony Firearm Statute Law & Society Review. ,vol. 13, pp. 393- 430 ,(1979) , 10.2307/3053261
James L. Gibson, RACE AS A DETERMINANT OF CRIMINAL SENTENCES: A METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE AND A CASE STUDY Law & Society Review. ,vol. 12, pp. 455- ,(1978) , 10.2307/3053289
Malcolm M Feeley, The Effects of Heavy Caseloads ,(1978)
Herbert M. Kritzer, An Introduction to Multivariate Contingency Table Analysis American Journal of Political Science. ,vol. 22, pp. 187- 226 ,(1978) , 10.2307/2110676
Lief H. Carter, Pamela J. Utz, Pamela J. Utz, Settling the Facts: Discretion and Negotiation in Criminal Court Law & Society Review. ,vol. 13, pp. 605- ,(1979) , 10.2307/3053275