Influence of stent design on 1-year outcome after coronary stent placement: a randomized comparison of five stent types in 1,147 unselected patients.
作者： Adnan Kastrati , Josef Dirschinger , Peter Boekstegers , Shpend Elezi , Helmut Sch�hlen
DOI: 10.1002/1522-726X(200007)50:3<290::AID-CCD5>3.0.CO;2-W
关键词: Surgery 、 Medicine 、 Incidence (epidemiology) 、 Stent 、 Radiology 、 Restenosis 、 Myocardial infarction 、 Coronary stent 、 Randomized controlled trial 、 Thrombosis 、 Clinical endpoint
摘要: The objective of this randomized trial was to assess whether differences in stent design are translated different clinical outcomes patients undergoing coronary placement. This multicenter included 1,147 who were randomly assigned receive one five types stainless steel stents: Inflow, MULTI-LINK, NIR, Palmaz-Schatz, and PURA-A stent. Primary endpoint the study event-free survival at 1 year. Event-free year significantly between groups (P = 0.014), ranging from 69.4% 82.4%. Similarly, freedom myocardial infarction also 0.022), with values 88.2% 95.2%. Diameter stenosis 6 months varied 38.1% ± 25.0% 45.6% 27.7% 0.046), late lumen loss ranged 1.01 0.70 mm 1.20 0.82 0.085), incidence restenosis 25.3% 35.9% 0.145). Thus, has a significant impact on long-term results after Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 50:290–297, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(33)
Javier Escaned, Javier Goicolea, Fernando Alfonso, Maria José Perez-Vizcayno, Rosana Hernandez, Antonio Fernandez-Ortiz, Camino Bañuelos, Carlos Macaya, Propensity and mechanisms of restenosis in different coronary stent designs Journal of the American College of Cardiology. ,vol. 34, pp. 1490- 1497 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00378-2
Schühlen H, Kastrati A, Hadamitzky M, Walter H, Ulm K, Neumann Fj, Dirschinger J, Elezi S, Schömig A, Hausleiter J, Zitzmann-Roth E, Restenosis after coronary stent placement and randomization to a 4-week combined antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy: six-month angiographic follow-up of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen (ISAR) Trial. Circulation. ,vol. 96, pp. 462- 467 ,(1997)
W Kübler, M Zimmermann, W Ensinger, C Hehrlein, J Metz, Influence of surface texture and charge on the biocompatibility of endovascular stents. Coronary Artery Disease. ,vol. 6, pp. 581- 586 ,(1995)
Campbell Rogers, Elazer R. Edelman, Endovascular Stent Design Dictates Experimental Restenosis and Thrombosis Circulation. ,vol. 91, pp. 2995- 3001 ,(1995) , 10.1161/01.CIR.91.12.2995
George Dangas, Valentin Fuster, Management of restenosis after coronary intervention American Heart Journal. ,vol. 132, pp. 428- 436 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0002-8703(96)90442-1
SH Hofma, DMC Whelan, HMM Van Beusekom, PD Verdouw, WJ Van der Giessen, Increasing arterial wall injury after long-term implantation of two types of stent in a porcine coronary model European Heart Journal. ,vol. 19, pp. 601- 609 ,(1998) , 10.1053/EUHJ.1997.0753
Harald Mudra, Evelyn Regar, Volker Klauss, Frank Werner, Karl-Heinz Henneke, Efthia Sbarouni, Karl Theisen, Serial Follow-up After Optimized Ultrasound-Guided Deployment of Palmaz-Schatz Stents In-Stent Neointimal Proliferation Without Significant Reference Segment Response Circulation. ,vol. 95, pp. 363- 370 ,(1997) , 10.1161/01.CIR.95.2.363
Olivier F Bertrand, Rajender Sipehia, Rosaire Mongrain, Josep Rodés, Jean-Claude Tardif, Luc Bilodeau, Gilles Côté, Martial G Bourassa, Biocompatibility aspects of new stent technology Journal of the American College of Cardiology. ,vol. 32, pp. 562- 571 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00289-7
Spencer B. King, David O. Williams, Prakash Chougule, J. Larry Klein, Ron Waksman, Richard Hilstead, Joan Macdonald, Kris Anderberg, Ian R. Crocker, Endovascular β-Radiation to Reduce Restenosis After Coronary Balloon Angioplasty Results of the Beta Energy Restenosis Trial (BERT) Circulation. ,vol. 97, pp. 2025- 2030 ,(1998) , 10.1161/01.CIR.97.20.2025
Eric J Topol, Randomised placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty- controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade The Lancet. ,vol. 352, pp. 87- 92 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)85010-1