Productivity in Construction-A Critical Review of Research

作者: D. A. R. Dolage , P. Chan

DOI: 10.4038/ENGINEER.V46I4.6808

关键词: PositivismCasualConstruction industryProductivityMarketingTest (assessment)EngineeringData collectionSocial dimensionPerspective (graphical)Management

摘要: The aim is to bring a fresh perspective the construction productivity research agenda, which congruent with new demands in industry and its ever changing nature. articles had ‘construction productivity’ as keyword abstract, were published each of three journals (JCEM, CEM IJP) from earliest year that been uploaded respective official website journal identified. Out 5862 searched, only 121 fulfilled selection criteria, titles examined. past decade has witnessed continuation same relentless interest studies. findings revealed that, studies: five types have examined; data collection methods deployed; objects can be classified under seven categories. high number studies are devoted ‘measurement ‘examining casual relationships productivity’. study ascertained main drawbacks strong empirical inclination methodologies adopted overwhelming positivist approach examining issues. absence follow-up investigate validity measurement techniques models test claims made improvement studies, striking feature. Another impressive finding lack scholarly attention incorporate blue-collar worker perspective, employee involvement, social dimension into research. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/engineer.v46i4.6808 ENGINEER, Vol. 46, No.04, pp. 31-42, 2013

参考文章(33)
Margaret Emsley, A Makulsawatudom, Critical Factors Influencing Construction Productivity in Thailand In: Proceedings of the 10th International CIB Symposium of the W65 Commission on Organisation and Management of Construction: Construction Innovation and Global Competitiveness. University of Cincinnati: Proceedings of the 10th International CIB Symposium of the W65 Commission on Organisation and Management of Construction: Construction Innovation and Global Competitiveness. University of Cincinnati; 2002. p. 1446-1456.. pp. 1446- 1456 ,(2002)
EC Lim, Jahidul Alum, Construction productivity: Issues encountered by contractors in Singapore International Journal of Project Management. ,vol. 13, pp. 51- 58 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0263-7863(95)95704-H
Paul M. Goodrum, Carl T. Haas, Partial Factor Productivity and Equipment Technology Change at Activity Level in U.S. Construction Industry Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce. ,vol. 128, pp. 463- 472 ,(2002) , 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:6(463)
Hee-Sung Park, Conceptual framework of construction productivity estimation Ksce Journal of Civil Engineering. ,vol. 10, pp. 311- 317 ,(2006) , 10.1007/BF02830084
Peter F Kaming, Gary D Holt, Simon T Kometa, Paul O Olomolaiye, Severity diagnosis of productivity problems - A reliability analysis International Journal of Project Management. ,vol. 16, pp. 107- 113 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00036-7
David W. Halligan, Laura A. Demsetz, James D. Brown, Clark B. Pace, Action-Response Model and Loss of Productivity in Construction Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce. ,vol. 120, pp. 47- 64 ,(1994) , 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:1(47)
H. Randolph Thomas, Cody T. Mathews, James G. Ward, LEARNING CURVE MODELS OF CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTIVITY Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce. ,vol. 112, pp. 245- 258 ,(1986) , 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1986)112:2(245)
Abdulaziz M. Jarkas, Camille G. Bitar, Factors Affecting Construction Labor Productivity in Kuwait Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. ,vol. 138, pp. 811- 820 ,(2012) , 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000501
Tarek M. Zayed, Daniel W. Halpin, Pile construction productivity assessment Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce. ,vol. 131, pp. 705- 714 ,(2005) , 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:6(705)
Paul W. Chan, Ammar Kaka, Productivity improvements: understand the workforce perceptions of productivity first Personnel Review. ,vol. 36, pp. 564- 584 ,(2007) , 10.1108/00483480710752803