作者: Laurence J. Coleman , Michael D. Sanders , Tracy L. Cross
DOI: 10.1177/001698629704100306
关键词: Field (Bourdieu) 、 Conjunction (grammar) 、 Mode (music) 、 Pedagogy 、 Philosophy of education 、 Psychology 、 Social epistemology 、 Identification (psychology) 、 Transformative learning 、 Curriculum
摘要: For many years, educators of the gifted have debated topics central to field such as definition, identification, and curriculum (Getzels & Dillon, 1973). This paper explores possible relationships between periodic debates philosophical war among advocates differing perspectives social science research. The authors discuss how acceptance a particular mode inquiry embeds tacit ideas into debate that make resolution difficult. assumptions three modes disciplined (empirical-analytic, interpretive, transformative) are presented in conjunction with accompanying reformulation reconceptualization issues (definition, curriculum) occur each inquiry.