Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy--Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, United States, 40 sites, 2000-2010.

作者: Karilynn M Rockhill , Lucinda J England , Patricia M Dietz , Van T Tong , Denise V D'Angelo

DOI:

关键词: Public healthPregnancyInfant mortalityBirth certificateMedicineEnvironmental healthRisk assessmentPopulationSudden infant death syndromeSmoking cessation

摘要: Problem Smoking among nonpregnant women contributes to reduced fertility, and smoking during pregnancy is associated with delivery of preterm infants, low infant birthweight, increased mortality. After delivery, exposure secondhand smoke can increase an infant's risk for respiratory tract infections dying sudden death syndrome. During 2000-2004, estimated 174,000 in the United States died annually from smoking-attributable causes, 776 infants causes attributed maternal pregnancy. Reporting period covered 2000-2005. Description system The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) was initiated 1987 ongoing state- population-based surveillance designed monitor selected behaviors experiences that occur before, during, after who deliver live-born States. Self-reported questionnaire data are linked birth certificate weighted represent all delivering live state. were obtained PRAMS certificates. This report provides on trends (aggregated site-specific estimates) describes characteristics female smokers these periods. Results For study 2000-2005, 31 sites (Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Mexico, York, York City, North Carolina, Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia) included this report. All have met Healthy People 2010 (HP 2010) objective increasing percentage pregnant stop 30%; quit rates 2005 ranged 30.2% 61.0%. However, none achieved HP reducing prevalence prenatal 1%; 5.2% 35.7%. 2000--2005, two (New Mexico Utah) experienced decreasing pregnancy, (Illinois Jersey) only. Three (Louisiana, had increases Arkansas before majority sites, did not change over time or 16 (Alaska, [excluding City], which available entire 6-year period, remained unchanged, approximately one five (from 22.3% 2000 21.5% 2005) reporting declined (p = 0.01) 15.2% 13.8% 2005, 0.04) 18.1% 16.4% 2005. Interpretation results indicate efforts reduce been effective; however, targeting some success as delivery. Current tobacco-control smoking-cessation sufficient reach Public health action provided important developing, monitoring, evaluating state policies programs smokers. through sustained comprehensive (e.g., smoke-free tobacco excise taxes). Health-care providers should assess status their patients offer effective interventions every smoker whom they provide health-care services.

参考文章(34)
Hamisu M. Salihu, Muktar H. Aliyu, Bosny J. Pierre-Louis, Greg R. Alexander, Levels of Excess Infant Deaths Attributable to Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy in the United States Maternal and Child Health Journal. ,vol. 7, pp. 219- 227 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1027319517405
Alicia M. Allen, Patricia M. Dietz, Van T. Tong, Lucinda England, Cheryl B. Prince, Prenatal smoking prevalence ascertained from two population-based data sources: birth certificates and PRAMS questionnaires, 2004. Public Health Reports. ,vol. 123, pp. 586- 592 ,(2008) , 10.1177/003335490812300508
Holly B. Shulman, Brenda Colley Gilbert, Amy Lansky, The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates. Public Health Reports. ,vol. 121, pp. 74- 83 ,(2006) , 10.1177/003335490612100114
C. G. Husten, A. Rosenthal, S. B. McMenamin, H. A. Halpin, N. M. Bellows, State medicaid coverage for tobacco-dependence treatments - United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. ,vol. 58, pp. 1199- 1204 ,(2009)
Tim Coleman, Catherine Chamberlain, Mary-Ann Davey, Sue E Cooper, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Pharmacological interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 3, ,(2015) , 10.1002/14651858.CD010078.PUB2
Judith Lumley, Catherine Chamberlain, Therese Dowswell, Sandy Oliver, Laura Oakley, Lyndsey Watson, Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,(2009) , 10.1002/14651858.CD001055.PUB3
Shin Y. Kim, Lucinda J. England, Juliette S. Kendrick, Patricia M. Dietz, William M. Callaghan, The contribution of clinic-based interventions to reduce prenatal smoking prevalence among US women. American Journal of Public Health. ,vol. 99, pp. 893- 898 ,(2009) , 10.2105/AJPH.2008.144485
Gregory J Colman, Ted Joyce, Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy in ten states. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. ,vol. 24, pp. 29- 35 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00574-3
Patricia M. Dietz, Lucinda J. England, Carrie K. Shapiro-Mendoza, Van T. Tong, Sherry L. Farr, William M. Callaghan, Infant Morbidity and Mortality Attributable to Prenatal Smoking in the U.S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. ,vol. 39, pp. 45- 52 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2010.03.009
Sara Markowitz, E. Kathleen Adams, Patricia M. Dietz, Viji Kannan, Van T. Tong, Tobacco Control Policies, Birth Outcomes, and Maternal Human Capital Journal of Human Capital. ,vol. 7, pp. 130- 160 ,(2013) , 10.1086/671020