Renewable Energy Problems: Exploring the Methods to Support the Decision-Making Process

作者: Paula Donaduzzi Rigo , Graciele Rediske , Carmen Brum Rosa , Natália Gava Gastaldo , Leandro Michels

DOI: 10.3390/SU122310195

关键词: Efficient energy useMultiple-criteria decision analysisRenewable energyDecision-makingProcess (engineering)Risk analysis (engineering)Decision support systemComputer scienceSustainabilitySustainable development

摘要: In the current scenario of increasing energy demand and encouraging sustainable development in countries, sector’s planning has become more complex, involving multiple factors, such as technical, economic, environmental, social, political. The decision process plays a vital role structuring evaluating complex situations related to sector, considering various criteria objectives, adopting policies promote efficiency actions by research on renewable sources strategic decisions. high number multi-criteria support methods (MCDM) available their solving highly problems results an impasse with selection application specific situations. Thus, scientific community requires methodological approaches that help decision-maker select method consistent his problem. Accordingly, this paper conducts Systematic Literature Review (SLR) associated MCDM based final set 163 articles. We identified five categories solved techniques: Source selection, location, sustainability, project performance, technological performance. separate into evaluation steps (alternative weighting, alternatives, post-assessment analyzes), we extract used each step from papers. This paper’s main contribution is identifying most common area problem they solve. manuscript helps decision-makers, entrepreneurs, investors, policy-makers improve ability choose proper solve problems.

参考文章(190)
Tim Höfer, Yasin Sunak, Hafiz Siddique, Reinhard Madlener, Wind farm siting using a spatial Analytic Hierarchy Process approach: A case study of the Städteregion Aachen Applied Energy. ,vol. 163, pp. 222- 243 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2015.10.138
Kazim Baris Atici, Ahmet Bahadir Simsek, Aydin Ulucan, Mustafa Umur Tosun, A GIS-based Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis approach for wind power plant site selection Utilities Policy. ,vol. 37, pp. 86- 96 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JUP.2015.06.001
Wolfgang Ossadnik, Stefanie Schinke, Ralf H. Kaspar, Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis Group Decision and Negotiation. ,vol. 25, pp. 421- 457 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S10726-015-9448-4
Sezi Cevik Onar, Basar Oztaysi, İrem Otay, Cengiz Kahraman, Multi-expert wind energy technology selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets Energy. ,vol. 90, pp. 274- 285 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ENERGY.2015.06.086
Ling Zhang, Peng Zhou, Sidney Newton, Jian-xin Fang, De-qun Zhou, Lu-ping Zhang, Evaluating clean energy alternatives for Jiangsu, China: An improved multi-criteria decision making method Energy. ,vol. 90, pp. 953- 964 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ENERGY.2015.07.124
J.M. Sánchez-Lozano, M.S. García-Cascales, M.T. Lamata, Evaluation of suitable locations for the installation of solar thermoelectric power plants Computers & Industrial Engineering. ,vol. 87, pp. 343- 355 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.CIE.2015.05.028
Thomas L. Saaty, Daji Ergu, When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making. ,vol. 14, pp. 1171- 1187 ,(2015) , 10.1142/S021962201550025X
A Ishizaka, D Balkenborg, T Kaplan, Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP Journal of the Operational Research Society. ,vol. 62, pp. 700- 710 ,(2011) , 10.1057/JORS.2010.23
Ümran Şengül, Miraç Eren, Seyedhadi Eslamian Shiraz, Volkan Gezder, Ahmet Bilal Şengül, Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey Renewable Energy. ,vol. 75, pp. 617- 625 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.RENENE.2014.10.045