作者: G. Dwivedi , R. Janardhanan , S. A. Hayat , T. K. Lim , R. Senior
DOI: 10.1093/EJECHOCARD/JEP099
关键词: Ejection fraction 、 Proportional hazards model 、 Medicine 、 Internal medicine 、 Myocardial infarction 、 Prospective cohort study 、 Chi-squared distribution 、 Cardiology 、 Reperfusion therapy 、 Predictive value of tests 、 Ventricular remodeling
摘要: Aims Contrast echocardiography has been shown to be a more accurate method of assessing left ventricular (LV) remodelling compared with unenhanced after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, whether this translated into improved prediction outcome is not known. Methods and results Accordingly, total 89 consecutive patients undergoing contrast 7 10 days AMI reperfusion therapy were followed up for cardiac death (CD) AMI. LV ejection fraction (LVEF), end-systolic volume (ESV), enddiastolic assessed by the two methods independently. Outcome data obtained (mean 46+ 16 months).There 15 (17%) events (eight CDs seven AMIs). LVEF ESV found independent multivariable predictors CD (P ¼ 0.04 P 0.02, respectively) or 0.02 0.01, respectively). Furthermore, provided incremental information 0.004 0.004, 0.03, Conclusion following