Knowledge co-production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans

作者: Jeanne L. Nel , Dirk J. Roux , Amanda Driver , Liesl Hill , Ashton C. Maherry

DOI: 10.1111/COBI.12560

关键词: Environmental resource managementBoundary (real estate)NegotiationProcess (engineering)Knowledge-based systemsBoundary-workMarxanAgency (sociology)Computer scienceWork (electrical)

摘要: Knowledge co-production and boundary work offer planners a new frame for critically designing social process that fosters collaborative implementation of resulting plans. co- production involves stakeholders from diverse knowledge systems working iteratively toward common vision action. Boundary is means creating permeable boundaries satisfy the needs multiple groups while guarding functional integrity contributing systems. Resulting products are objects mutual interest maintain coherence across all boundaries. We examined how can bridge gap between planning promote cross-sectoral cooperation. applied these concepts to well-established stages in regional conservation within national scale project aimed at identifying areas conserving rivers wetlands South Africa developing an institutional environment promoting their conservation. occurred over 4 years interactive stake- holder workshops included co-development freshwater goals spatial data on biodiversity local feasibility; translation into quantitative inputs were used Marxan select draft priority areas; review packaging map atlas manual application area maps 37 different decision-making contexts. stimulated dialogue negotiation built capacity multi-scale beyond project. The information integrated types 450 represented >1000 collective experience. provided consistent source have been 25 use contexts since launch just 3 ago. When framed as supported by work, plans be developed valuable tangible tool multi- agency cooperation around Our provides practical guidance uptake science contributes evidence base efforts improved.

参考文章(42)
BELINDA REYERS, DIRK J. ROUX, RICHARD M. COWLING, AIMEE E. GINSBURG, JEANNE L. NEL, PATRICK O’ FARRELL, Conservation planning as a transdisciplinary process. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 24, pp. 957- 965 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2010.01497.X
David C. Rose, The case for policy-relevant conservation science Conservation Biology. ,vol. 29, pp. 748- 754 ,(2015) , 10.1111/COBI.12444
Robert L. Pressey, Morena Mills, Rebecca Weeks, Jon C. Day, The plan of the day: managing the dynamic transition from regional conservation designs to local conservation actions Biological Conservation. ,vol. 166, pp. 155- 169 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2013.06.025
Juliette C. Young, Kerry A. Waylen, Simo Sarkki, Steve Albon, Ian Bainbridge, Estelle Balian, James Davidson, David Edwards, Roddy Fairley, Ceri Margerison, Davy McCracken, Roger Owen, Christopher P. Quine, Charles Stewart-Roper, Des Thompson, Rob Tinch, Sybille Van den Hove, Allan Watt, Improving the science-policy dialogue to meet the challenges of biodiversity conservation: having conversations rather than talking at one-another Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 23, pp. 387- 404 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S10531-013-0607-0
Dave D White, Amber Wutich, Kelli L Larson, Patricia Gober, Timothy Lant, Clea Senneville, Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: water managers' assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater Science and Public Policy. ,vol. 37, pp. 219- 232 ,(2010) , 10.3152/030234210X497726
John Parker, Beatrice Crona, On being all things to all people: Boundary organizations and the contemporary research university Social Studies of Science. ,vol. 42, pp. 262- 289 ,(2012) , 10.1177/0306312711435833
THOMAS W. FITZHUGH, JONATHAN V. HIGGINS, MARK T. BRYER, MARY L. KHOURY, A Freshwater Classification Approach for Biodiversity Conservation Planning Conservation Biology. ,vol. 19, pp. 432- 445 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2005.00504.X
Derek Armitage, Fikret Berkes, Aaron Dale, Erik Kocho-Schellenberg, Eva Patton, Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 21, pp. 995- 1004 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2011.04.006