The plan of the day: managing the dynamic transition from regional conservation designs to local conservation actions

作者: Robert L. Pressey , Morena Mills , Rebecca Weeks , Jon C. Day

DOI: 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2013.06.025

关键词:

摘要: In numerous and important situations across the globe, transition from designs to actions in conservation planning requires multiple iterations. Regional need be updated progressively as some applied depart spatially areas notionally selected for conservation, or intended prove infeasible undesirable. For researchers organizations fully capitalize on enormous investment around world, regional must seen, not static products, but starting points ongoing adaptation. We explain 18 reasons why adapted, either anticipation of are applied. Our four groups: early fine-tuning; mistakes surprises; new data; major overhaul. show that relative importance these varies between three situations: 1. rapid application, when simultaneously all parts designs; 2. protracted when, more typically, incrementally over extended periods; 3. revision designs, mandated spontaneous. then explore conceptual, operational, institutional, policy implications being, needing be, dynamic. The weaknesses methods most starkly revealed by adapt during application private community-managed lands marine waters.

参考文章(99)
Madhav Gadgil, Fikret Berkes, Carl Folke, Indigenous Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation Bioone. ,(1993)
R. M. Cowling, B. Egoh, A. T. Knight, P. J. O'Farrell, B. Reyers, M. Rouget, D. J. Roux, A. Welz, A. Wilhelm-Rechman, An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 105, pp. 9483- 9488 ,(2008) , 10.1073/PNAS.0706559105
Alison Green, Scott E. Smith, Geoff Lipsett-Moore, Craig Groves, Nate Peterson, Stu Sheppard, Paul Lokani, Richard Hamilton, Jeanine Almany, Joseph Aitsi, Leo Bualia, Designing a resilient network of marine protected areas for Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea. Oryx. ,vol. 43, pp. 488- 498 ,(2009) , 10.1017/S0030605309990342
L. J. McCook, G. R. Almany, M. L. Berumen, J. C. Day, A. L. Green, G. P. Jones, J. M. Leis, S. Planes, G. R. Russ, P. F. Sale, S. R. Thorrold, Management under uncertainty: guide-lines for incorporating connectivity into the protection of coral reefs Coral Reefs. ,vol. 28, pp. 353- 366 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S00338-008-0463-7
Eli Meir, Sandy Andelman, Hugh P. Possingham, Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world Ecology Letters. ,vol. 7, pp. 615- 622 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1461-0248.2004.00624.X
Jorge G. Álvarez-Romero, Robert L. Pressey, Natalie C. Ban, Ken Vance-Borland, Chuck Willer, Carissa Joy Klein, Steven D. Gaines, Integrated Land-Sea Conservation Planning: The Missing Links Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. ,vol. 42, pp. 381- 409 ,(2011) , 10.1146/ANNUREV-ECOLSYS-102209-144702
P. R. Armsworth, G. C. Daily, P. Kareiva, J. N. Sanchirico, Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 103, pp. 5403- 5408 ,(2006) , 10.1073/PNAS.0505278103
Shirley M. Pierce, Richard M. Cowling, Andrew T. Knight, Amanda T. Lombard, Mathieu Rouget, Trevor Wolf, Systematic conservation planning products for land-use planning: Interpretation for implementation Biological Conservation. ,vol. 125, pp. 441- 458 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2005.04.019