Governing climate risks in the face of normative uncertainties
作者： Behnam Taebi , Jan H. Kwakkel , Céline Kermisch
DOI: 10.1002/WCC.666
关键词: Adaptation strategies 、 Positive economics 、 Reflective equilibrium 、 Risk governance 、 Uncertainty quantification 、 Action (philosophy) 、 Normative 、 Face (sociological concept) 、 Economics 、 Climate change
摘要: Governing risks is not only a technical matter, but also matter of ethical and societal considerations. In this article, we argue that in addition to scientific uncertainties, need address normative uncertainties risk decisions. We define as situations where there are different partially morally defensible -- incompatible options or courses action, ones which no fully option. conceptualize distinguishing between the four categories evolutionary, theoretical, conceptual, epistemic uncertainties. will show instances climate adaptation strategies. finally present two methods for identifying dealing with namely, Wide Reflective Equilibrium adaptive planning. Situations have always been continue be decisions they often dealt an implicit manner. make them explicit, could lead better informed justified about risks. This article categorized under: Climate, Nature, Ethics > Climate Change.
tudelft.nl参考文章(55)
Andy Stirling, Risk, uncertainty and precaution: some instrumental implications from the social sciences Edward Elgar. ,(2003) , 10.4337/9781843765653.00008
Robert Lempert, Steven Popper, Steven Bankes, Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative Long-Term Policy Analysis RAND Corporation. ,(2003) , 10.7249/MR1626
P Bloemen, AC Petersen, Planned Adaptation in Design and Testing of Critical Infrastructure: The Case of Flood Safety in The Netherlands In: Dolan, T and Collins, B, (eds.) International Symposium for Next Generation Infrastructure Conference Proceedings: 30 September - 1 October 2014 International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA),Schloss Laxenburg, Vienna, Austria. (pp. 221 - 225). UCL STEaPP: London, UK. (2015). ,(2015)
A. Dewulf, M. Craps, R. Bouwen, T. Taillieu, C. Pahl-Wostl, Integrated management of natural resources: dealing with ambiguous issues, multiple actors and diverging frames. Water Science and Technology. ,vol. 52, pp. 115- 124 ,(2005) , 10.2166/WST.2005.0159
Norman Daniels, Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics The Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 76, pp. 256- 282 ,(1979) , 10.2307/2025881
A. Correljé, B. Broekhans, Flood risk management in the Netherlands after the 1953 flood: a competition between the public value(s) of water Journal of Flood Risk Management. ,vol. 8, pp. 99- 115 ,(2015) , 10.1111/JFR3.12087
Lynn K. Mytelka, Keith Smith, Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co-evolving process Research Policy. ,vol. 31, pp. 1467- 1479 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00076-8
M.Elisabeth Paté-Cornell, Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment Reliability Engineering & System Safety. ,vol. 54, pp. 95- 111 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00067-1
GEORGE J. BUSENBERG, Learning in Organizations and Public Policy Journal of Public Policy. ,vol. 21, pp. 173- 189 ,(2001) , 10.1017/S0143814X0100109X
Andreas Klinke, Ortwin Renn, A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk-based, precaution-based, and discourse-based strategies. Risk Analysis. ,vol. 22, pp. 1071- 1094 ,(2002) , 10.1111/1539-6924.00274