The future of clinical anatomy

作者: Hannah Shaw , Richard Crowson , Odile Plaisant , J.Bernard Moxham

DOI:

关键词: CohortValue (ethics)NarrativeAmbivalenceClinical anatomyMedicineThurstone scaleDiseaseContext (language use)Medical education

摘要: Attitudes of medical students to the teaching anatomy in a clinical context and their knowledge medicine when first entering courses were assessed cohort at Paris (n=280) two cohorts Cardiff (n = 300) using questionnaires that included Thurstone Chaveattitude analyses. The findings indicate that,in early years training, prefer be made explicitly relevant needs, although there was no strong belief teachers should clinically qualified. Furthermore, while appreciated value examples/scenarios or case histories teaching, use assessments drew ambivalent responses. results surveys also showed that, terms musculoskeletal, cardiovascular respiratory medicine, many come with significant before they commence education training school. This finding suggests educational benefit can obtained by encouraging impart existing them recounting “narratives” whereby obtained. highlight perceived importance anatomy, both as scientific discipline, relates issues concerned understanding culture health disease.

参考文章(16)
Reinhard Pabst, Anatomy curriculum for medical students Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger. ,vol. 191, pp. 541- 546 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.AANAT.2009.08.007
Nigel Lemon, Attitudes and their measurement. John Wiley & Sons. ,(1973)
C Ockleford, S Standring, S Whiten, J Morris, S McHanwell, I Parkin, J Wilton, D C Davies, R Dyball, M Atkinson, A core syllabus in anatomy for medical students:Adding common sense to need to know European journal of anatomy. ,vol. 11, pp. 3- 18 ,(2007)
Jane Kerby, Zena N. Shukur, Joseph Shalhoub, The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by medical students. Clinical Anatomy. ,vol. 24, pp. 489- 497 ,(2011) , 10.1002/CA.21059
K.M. Patel, B.J. Moxham, Attitudes of professional anatomists to curricular change Clinical Anatomy. ,vol. 19, pp. 132- 141 ,(2005) , 10.1002/CA.20249