Vantage Sensitivity: Environmental Sensitivity to Positive Experiences as a Function of Genetic Differences.

作者: Michael Pluess

DOI: 10.1111/JOPY.12218

关键词: Perspective (graphical)PsychologyGenetic predispositionPopulationNeurocognitiveSocial inequalitySocial psychologyEmpirical evidencePsychological resilienceDevelopmental psychologyFunction (engineering)

摘要: A large number of gene-environment interaction studies provide evidence that some people are more likely to be negatively affected by adverse experiences as a function specific genetic variants. However, such "risk" variants surprisingly frequent in the population. Evolutionary analysis suggests associated with increased risk for maladaptive development under environmental conditions maintained population because they also advantages response different contextual conditions. These may include (a) coexisting resilience pertaining other influences, (b) general susceptibility both low and high quality, (c) propensity benefit disproportionately from positive supportive exposures, reflected recent framework vantage sensitivity. After introducing basic properties sensitivity highlighting conceptual similarities differences diathesis-stress differential patterns interaction, selected empirical notion is reviewed. The unique contribution new perspective make our understanding social inequality will discussed after suggesting neurocognitive molecular mechanisms hypothesized underlie benevolent experiences.

参考文章(74)
Marcus R. Munafò, Sarah M. Brown, Ahmad R. Hariri, Serotonin Transporter (5-HTTLPR) Genotype and Amygdala Activation: A Meta-Analysis Biological Psychiatry. ,vol. 63, pp. 852- 857 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.BIOPSYCH.2007.08.016
R Plomin, M. Owen, P McGuffin, The genetic basis of complex human behaviors Science. ,vol. 264, pp. 1733- 1739 ,(1994) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.8209254
Karine Sergerie, Caroline Chochol, Jorge L. Armony, The role of the amygdala in emotional processing: a quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. ,vol. 32, pp. 811- 830 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2007.12.002
CHARLES H. ZEANAH, CHARLES A. NELSON, NATHAN A. FOX, ANNA T. SMYKE, PETER MARSHALL, SUSAN W. PARKER, SEBASTIAN KOGA, Designing research to study the effects of institutionalization on brain and behavioral development: the Bucharest Early Intervention Project. Development and Psychopathology. ,vol. 15, pp. 885- 907 ,(2003) , 10.1017/S0954579403000452
Li Chen, Hong Pan, Ta Anh Tuan, Ai Ling Teh, Julia L. MacIsaac, Sarah M. Mah, Lisa M. McEwen, Yue Li, Helen Chen, Birit F. P. Broekman, Jan Paul Buschdorf, Yap Seng Chong, Kenneth Kwek, Seang Mei Saw, Peter D. Gluckman, Marielle V. Fortier, Anne Rifkin-Graboi, Michael S. Kobor, Anqi Qiu, Michael J. Meaney, Joanna D. Holbrook, , Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism influences the association of the methylome with maternal anxiety and neonatal brain volumes. Development and Psychopathology. ,vol. 27, pp. 137- 150 ,(2015) , 10.1017/S0954579414001357
Baldwin M. Way, Shelley E. Taylor, Social Influences on Health: Is Serotonin a Critical Mediator? Psychosomatic Medicine. ,vol. 72, pp. 107- 112 ,(2010) , 10.1097/PSY.0B013E3181CE6A7D
Scott M. Monroe, Anne D. Simons, Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: Implications for the depressive disorders. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 110, pp. 406- 425 ,(1991) , 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.406
I. I. Gottesman, J. Shields, A polygenic theory of schizophrenia Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 58, pp. 199- 205 ,(1967) , 10.1073/PNAS.58.1.199
Robert A Power, Simon Kyaga, Rudolf Uher, James H MacCabe, Niklas Långström, Mikael Landen, Peter McGuffin, Cathryn M Lewis, Paul Lichtenstein, Anna C Svensson, None, Fecundity of Patients With Schizophrenia, Autism, Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Anorexia Nervosa, or Substance Abuse vs Their Unaffected Siblings JAMA Psychiatry. ,vol. 70, pp. 22- 30 ,(2013) , 10.1001/JAMAPSYCHIATRY.2013.268