Social Inclusion or Market Competitiveness? A Comparison of Rural Development Policies in the European Union and the United States

作者: Sally Shortall , Mildred E. Warner

DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9515.2010.00730.X

关键词: Rural developmentEuropean unionEconomicsGeneral partnershipEconomic growth

摘要: The language of EU rural development policy appears more interested in social inclusion and that US market competitiveness. We seek to determine why policies directed at the USA differ. In both contexts new emphasize partnership participation but we find local is used promote competitiveness USA. An examination these dimensions illustrates important transcontinental differences similarities policies. explore socio-historical reasons for commitment inclusion, while also noting priority

参考文章(58)
Cris Shore, None, "In Uno Plures" (?) EU Cultural Policy and the Governance of Europe Cultural Analysis. ,vol. 5, pp. 7- ,(2006)
Shanna Ratner, Multi-Agency Service Teams: A New Approach in Maine To Deliver Technical Assistance to Rural Manufacturers. Rural Development Perspectives. ,vol. 13, pp. 49- 54 ,(1999)
J. Norman Reid, Community Empowerment: A New Approach for Rural Development. Rural Development Perspectives. ,vol. 14, pp. 9- 13 ,(1999)
Matthew Gorton, Carmen Hubbard, Lionel Hubbard, The Folly of European Union Policy Transfer: Why the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Does Not Fit Central and Eastern Europe Regional Studies. ,vol. 43, pp. 1305- 1317 ,(2009) , 10.1080/00343400802508802
Christopher Ray, Editorial. The eu leader Programme: Rural Development Laboratory Sociologia Ruralis. ,vol. 40, pp. 163- 171 ,(2000) , 10.1111/1467-9523.00138
Henry Buller, Re-creating rural territories: leader in France Sociologia Ruralis. ,vol. 40, pp. 190- 199 ,(2000) , 10.1111/1467-9523.00141
Sonia Livingstone, On the Challenges of Cross-National Comparative Media Research: European Journal of Communication. ,vol. 18, pp. 477- 500 ,(2003) , 10.1177/0267323103184003
Sarah F. Liebschutz, Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities: Reinventing Federalism for Distressed Communities Publius-the Journal of Federalism. ,vol. 25, pp. 117- 132 ,(1995) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.PUBJOF.A038200