Thermodynamic resolution: How do errors in modeled protein structures affect binding affinity predictions?

作者: Manoj Kumar Singh , Brian N Dominy , None

DOI: 10.1002/PROT.22691

关键词: Protein structureSmall moleculeComputational chemistryProtein structure predictionChemistryCrystal structureResolution (electron density)CrystallographyHomology modelingMolecular dynamicsBinding siteBiochemistryMolecular biologyStructural biology

摘要: The present study addresses the effect of structural distortion, caused by protein modeling errors, on calculated binding affinities toward small molecules. to a total 300 distorted structures based five different protein–ligand complexes were evaluated establish broadly applicable relationship between errors in structure and affinities. Relatively accurate models (less than 2 A RMSD within site) demonstrate 14.78 (±7.5)% deviation affinity from that using corresponding crystal structure. For 2–3 A, 3–4 >4 site, error increases 20.8 (±5.98), 22.79 (±11.3), 29.43 (±11.47)%, respectively. results described here may be used combination with other tools evaluate utility modeled for drug development or ligand-binding studies. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

参考文章(14)
Jayashree Srinivasan, Thomas E. Cheatham, Piotr Cieplak, Peter A. Kollman, David A. Case, Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices Journal of the American Chemical Society. ,vol. 120, pp. 9401- 9409 ,(1998) , 10.1021/JA981844+
Holmfridur B. Thorsteinsdottir, Torsten Schwede, Vincent Zoete, Markus Meuwly, How inaccuracies in protein structure models affect estimates of protein-ligand interactions: computational analysis of HIV-I protease inhibitor binding. Proteins. ,vol. 65, pp. 407- 423 ,(2006) , 10.1002/PROT.21096
Doree Sitkoff, Kim A. Sharp, Barry Honig, Correlating solvation free energies and surface tensions of hydrocarbon solutes Biophysical Chemistry. ,vol. 51, pp. 397- 409 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0301-4622(94)00062-X
Claudio N. Cavasotto, Sharangdhar S. Phatak, Homology modeling in drug discovery: current trends and applications. Drug Discovery Today. ,vol. 14, pp. 676- 683 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.DRUDIS.2009.04.006
M.K. Gilson, J.A. Given, B.L. Bush, J.A. McCammon, The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review Biophysical Journal. ,vol. 72, pp. 1047- 1069 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78756-3
Giulio Rastelli, Alberto Del Rio, Gianluca Degliesposti, Miriam Sgobba, Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM‐PBSA and MM‐GBSA Journal of Computational Chemistry. ,vol. 31, pp. 797- 810 ,(2009) , 10.1002/JCC.21372
Daisuke Kihara, Hao Chen, Yifeng Yang, Quality assessment of protein structure models. Current Protein & Peptide Science. ,vol. 10, pp. 216- 228 ,(2009) , 10.2174/138920309788452173
Charles L. Brooks, Wonpil Im, Michael S. Lee, Generalized born model with a simple smoothing function Journal of Computational Chemistry. ,vol. 24, pp. 1691- 1702 ,(2003) , 10.1002/JCC.10321
Marc A. Martí-Renom, Ashley C. Stuart, András Fiser, Roberto Sánchez, Francisco Melo, Andrej Šali, Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure. ,vol. 29, pp. 291- 325 ,(2000) , 10.1146/ANNUREV.BIOPHYS.29.1.291
Yang Zhang, Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. ,vol. 18, pp. 342- 348 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.SBI.2008.02.004