Male social status, physiology, and ability to block pregnancies in female house mice (Mus musculus)

作者: Jay B. Labov

DOI: 10.1007/BF00299528

关键词: Internal medicineBruce effectHouse miceBiologyPhysiologyEndocrinologyAnimal ecologySocial experienceAgonistic behaviourSocial statusPregnancy

摘要: 1. Dominant and subordinate male house mice (Mus musculus) were examined for differences in ability to induce a pregnancy block (Bruce effect) recently inseminated female conspecifics. 2. A became behaviorally dominant or by one two daily 15-min agonistic encounters with other 5 months. Social status was monitored the outcome of fighting, urine-marking patterns, animals' urine increase uterine weights prepubertal females. Clear found all these parameters during experiments. When killed, males had larger testes, preputials, seminal vesicles. Adrenal glands significantly heavier subordinates. 3. Subordinates blocked pregnancies as effectively both dominants control no previous social experience.

参考文章(29)
Martin Daly, Margo Wilson, Sex, evolution, and behavior : adaptations for reproduction Duxbury Press. ,(1978)
Donald A. Dewsbury, Comparative animal behavior ,(1978)
Edward Osborne Wilson, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis ,(1975)
Lester Krames, W. J. Carr, Brian Bergman, A pheromone associated with social dominance among male rats Psychonomic Science. ,vol. 16, pp. 11- 12 ,(1969) , 10.3758/BF03331885
J. G. VANDENBERGH, J. M. WHITSETT, J. R. LOMBARDI, Partial isolation of a pheromone accelerating puberty in female mice. Reproduction. ,vol. 43, pp. 515- 523 ,(1975) , 10.1530/JRF.0.0430515
FRANK F. MALLORY, RONALD J. BROOKS, Infanticide and other reproductive strategies in the collared lemming, Dicrostonyx groenlandicus Nature. ,vol. 273, pp. 144- 146 ,(1978) , 10.1038/273144A0
W. J. Carr, R. D. Martorano, Lester Krames, Responses of mice to odors associated with stress. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. ,vol. 71, pp. 223- 228 ,(1970) , 10.1037/H0029164
F. H. Bronson, The Reproductive Ecology of the House Mouse The Quarterly Review of Biology. ,vol. 54, pp. 265- 299 ,(1979) , 10.1086/411295