The impact of frequency of patient self-testing of prothrombin time on time in target range within VA Cooperative Study #481: The Home INR Study (THINRS), a randomized, controlled trial.

作者: David B Matchar , Sean R Love , Alan K Jacobson , Robert Edson , Lauren Uyeda

DOI: 10.1007/S11239-014-1128-8

关键词: Atrial fibrillationInternal medicineClinical endpointBleedProthrombin timeMedicineRandomized controlled trialSurgeryQuality of lifeStrokeWarfarin

摘要: Anticoagulation (AC) is effective in reducing thromboembolic events for individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF) or mechanical heart valve (MHV), but maintaining patients target range international normalized ratio (INR) can be difficult. Evidence suggests increasing INR testing frequency improve time (TTR), this impractical in-clinic testing. The objective of study was to test the hypothesis that more frequent patient-self (PST) via home monitoring increases TTR. This planned substudy conducted as part Home Study, a randomized controlled trial every 4 weeks versus PST at three different intervals. setting 6 VA centers across United States. 1,029 candidates AF MHV were trained and tested competency using ProTime meters; 787 deemed competent and, after second consent, four arms: high quality AC management (HQACM) dedicated clinic, venous once weeks; telephone monitored weekly; twice weekly. primary endpoint TTR 1-year follow-up. secondary endpoints were: major bleed, stroke death, life. Results showed increased (59.9 ± 16.7 %, 63.3 14.3 66.8 13.2 % [mean SD] groups underwent weeks, weekly weekly, respectively). proportion poorly managed (i.e., <50 %) significantly lower HQACM, decreased increased. Patients their care providers unblinded given nature HQACM. In conclusion, improved reduced patients.

参考文章(34)
David B. Matchar, Gregory P Samsa, Stuart J Cohen, Eugene Z Oddone, Community impact of anticoagulation services: rationale and design of the Managing Anticoagulation Services Trial (MAST). Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. ,vol. 9, pp. 7- 11 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1018722001817
F R Rosendaal, S C Cannegieter, F J M van der Meer, E Briët, A Method to Determine the Optimal Intensity of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy Thrombosis and Haemostasis. ,vol. 69, pp. 236- 239 ,(1993) , 10.1055/S-0038-1651587
Dieter Horstkotte, Cornelia Piper, Marcus Wiemer, Optimal Frequency of Patient Monitoring and Intensity of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Valvular Heart Disease. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. ,vol. 5, pp. 19- 24 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1013228718768
Adam J. Rose, Al Ozonoff, Dan R. Berlowitz, Arlene S. Ash, Joel I. Reisman, Elaine M. Hylek, Reexamining the Recommended Follow-up Interval After Obtaining an In-Range International Normalized Ratio Value Chest. ,vol. 140, pp. 359- 365 ,(2011) , 10.1378/CHEST.10-2738
Kenneth A. Bauer, Pros and cons of new oral anticoagulants Hematology. ,vol. 2013, pp. 464- 470 ,(2013) , 10.1182/ASHEDUCATION-2013.1.464
Richard H. White, Home Prothrombin Time Monitoring after the Initiation of Warfarin Therapy Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 111, pp. 730- 737 ,(1989) , 10.7326/0003-4819-111-9-730
John W. Eikelboom, Stuart J. Connolly, Martina Brueckmann, Christopher B. Granger, Arie P. Kappetein, Michael J. Mack, Jon Blatchford, Kevin Devenny, Jeffrey Friedman, Kelly Guiver, Ruth Harper, Yasser Khder, Maximilian T. Lobmeyer, Hugo Maas, Jens-Uwe Voigt, Maarten L. Simoons, Frans Van de Werf, Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 369, pp. 1206- 1214 ,(2013) , 10.1056/NEJMOA1300615