Effect of International Normalized Ratio monitoring at home versus the clinic on monitoring adherence in adults taking oral anticoagulant medications: a systematic review protocol.
作者： Lynndi M. Price , Elizabeth Hinton
DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003116
关键词:
摘要: REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to compare International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitoring adherence in two different settings: the outpatient INR clinic and patient's home or residence. seeks identify non-adherence trends both settings help providers determine which setting best for patients on warfarin improve adherence. Improved correlates with maintaining routine testing.Specifically, question what effect point-of-care compared adults taking oral anticoagulant medications?
sci-hub.se 参考文章(18)
David S. Frankel, Sarah E. Parker, Lynda E. Rosenfeld, Philip B. Gorelick, HRS/NSA 2014 survey of atrial fibrillation and stroke: Gaps in knowledge and perspective, opportunities for improvement Heart Rhythm. ,vol. 12, ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.HRTHM.2015.04.039
Yardlee S. Kauffman, Allison E. Schroeder, Daniel M. Witt, Patient Specific Factors Influencing Adherence to INR Monitoring Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. ,vol. 35, pp. 740- 747 ,(2015) , 10.1002/PHAR.1616
Caroline O Laurence, Angela Gialamas, Tanya Bubner, Lisa Yelland, Kristyn Willson, Phil Ryan, Justin Beilby, , Patient satisfaction with point-of-care testing in general practice British Journal of General Practice. ,vol. 60, pp. 166- 171 ,(2010) , 10.3399/BJGP10X483508
David B Matchar, Sean R Love, Alan K Jacobson, Robert Edson, Lauren Uyeda, Ciaran S Phibbs, Rowena J Dolor, None, The impact of frequency of patient self-testing of prothrombin time on time in target range within VA Cooperative Study #481: The Home INR Study (THINRS), a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. ,vol. 40, pp. 17- 25 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11239-014-1128-8
Bárbara Menéndez-Jándula, Juan Carlos Souto, Arturo Oliver, Isabel Montserrat, Mireia Quintana, Ignasi Gich, Xavier Bonfill, Jordi Fontcuberta, Comparing Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy with Clinic Management Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 142, pp. 1- 10 ,(2005) , 10.7326/0003-4819-142-1-200501040-00006
Hanna E. Bloomfield, Ange Krause, Nancy Greer, Brent C. Taylor, Roderick MacDonald, Indulis Rutks, Preetham Reddy, Timothy J. Wilt, Meta-analysis: effect of patient self-testing and self-management of long-term anticoagulation on major clinical outcomes Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 154, pp. 472- 482 ,(2011) , 10.7326/0003-4819-154-7-201104050-00005
Nathan P. Clark, Frequency of monitoring, non-adherence, and other topics dear to an anticoagulation clinic provider Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. ,vol. 35, pp. 320- 324 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11239-013-0887-Y
James D Douketis, Debbie Singh, Self-monitoring and self-dosing of oral anticoagulation improves survival. Evidence-based Cardiovascular Medicine. ,vol. 10, pp. 124- 126 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.EBCM.2006.04.021
Daniel M. Witt, Thomas Delate, Nathan P. Clark, David A. Garcia, Elaine M. Hylek, Walter Ageno, Francesco Dentali, Mark A. Crowther, Nonadherence with INR monitoring and anticoagulant complications. Thrombosis Research. ,vol. 132, ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.THROMRES.2013.06.006
Chris Gardiner, Karen Williams, Ian J. Mackie, Samuel J. Machin, Hannah Cohen, Patient self-testing is a reliable and acceptable alternative to laboratory INR monitoring. British Journal of Haematology. ,vol. 128, pp. 242- 247 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1365-2141.2004.05300.X