The Academic Development Study of Australian Twins (ADSAT): Research Aims and Design
作者： Sally A. Larsen , Callie W. Little , Katrina Grasby , Brian Byrne , Richard K. Olson
DOI: 10.1017/THG.2020.49
关键词: Sample (statistics) 、 Numeracy 、 Psychology 、 MEDLINE 、 Research design 、 Medical education 、 Academic development 、 Twin study 、 Literacy 、 Behavioural genetics
摘要: The Academic Development Study of Australian Twins was established in 2012 with the purpose investigating relative influence genes and environments literacy numeracy capabilities across two primary secondary school grades Australia. It is first longitudinal twin project its kind Australia comprises a sample 2762 pairs, 40 triplet sets 1485 nontwin siblings. Measures include standardized test data collected at Grades 3, 5, 7 9 as part National Assessment Program: Literacy Numeracy. A range demographic behavioral also collected, some multiple time points. This article outlines background rationale for study provides an overview research design, measures collected. Findings emerging from future directions are discussed.
sci-hub.st 参考文章(47)
John P. Haisken-DeNew, John P. Haisken-DeNew, Diana Warren, Early Bird Catches the Worm: The Causal Impact of Pre-School Participation and Teacher Qualifications on Year 3 National Naplan Cognitive Tests Social Science Research Network. ,(2013)
John A. C. Hattie, None, Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement ,(2008)
Jan Lokan, Lisa Greenwood, John Cresswell, 15-Up And Counting, Reading, Writing, Reasoning : How Literate Are Australian Students? : The PISA 2000 Survey Of Students' Reading, Mathematical And Scientific Literacy Skills ,(2001)
D.T. Lykken, T.J. Bouchard, M. McGue, A. Tellegen, The Minnesota twin family registry : some initial findings Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research. ,vol. 39, pp. 35- 70 ,(1990) , 10.1017/S0001566000005572
Gary N. Marks, School Sector Differences in Student Achievement in Australian Primary and Secondary Schools: A Longitudinal Analysis Journal of School Choice. ,vol. 9, pp. 219- 238 ,(2015) , 10.1080/15582159.2015.1028827
Jennifer Buckingham, Robyn Beaman, Kevin Wheldall, Why poor children are more likely to become poor readers: The early years. Educational Review. ,vol. 66, pp. 428- 446 ,(2014) , 10.1080/00131911.2013.795129
Nicole Harlaar, Philip S. Dale, Robert Plomin, From learning to read to reading to learn: substantial and stable genetic influence. Child Development. ,vol. 78, pp. 116- 131 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1467-8624.2007.00988.X
Espen Røysamb, Evalill Karevold, Tilmann von Soest, Kristin Gustavson, None, Attrition and generalizability in longitudinal studies: findings from a 15-year population-based study and a Monte Carlo simulation study BMC Public Health. ,vol. 12, pp. 918- 918 ,(2012) , 10.1186/1471-2458-12-918
Brian Byrne, Sally Wadsworth, Kristi Boehme, Andrew C. Talk, William L. Coventry, Richard K. Olson, Stefan Samuelsson, Robin Corley, Multivariate genetic analysis of learning and early reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading. ,vol. 17, pp. 224- 242 ,(2013) , 10.1080/10888438.2011.654298
Oliver S. P. Davis, Claire M. A. Haworth, Robert Plomin, Learning abilities and disabilities: generalist genes in early adolescence. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry. ,vol. 14, pp. 312- 331 ,(2009) , 10.1080/13546800902797106