Seismic design by the response spectrum method: A new interpretation of elliptical response envelopes and a novel equivalent static method based on probable linear combinations of modes

作者: Silvano Erlicher , Quang Sang Nguyen , François Martin

DOI: 10.1016/J.NUCENGDES.2014.05.011

关键词: Mathematical analysisContext (language use)Structural engineeringLinear combinationFinite element methodSeismic analysisResponse spectrumEnvelope (motion)MathematicsParallelepipedSimultaneity

摘要: Abstract At the design calculation phase, seismic analysis of a nuclear building is usually based on assumption structural linearity. Moreover, codes impose to consider three-component ground motions. In this context, response spectrum method likely most used approach. Different variants exist, main differences among them being related way superposing contributions three motion components and treatment simultaneity physically distinct responses. A set n r  ≥ 2 simultaneous values responses can be called vector . The basic provide peak value each response, allowing definition parallelepiped envelope for vectors: conservative since peaks responses, in general, do not occur simultaneously. Conversely, so-called elliptical envelopes , which are hyper-ellipsoids dimension correctly take into account simultaneity. first part paper, new interpretation presented, notion probable linear combinations modes practical use straightforward when  > 3, like e.g. case shell finite elements with membrane forces moments. standard procedure consists approximating by an enveloping polyhedron, whose vertices define vectors. refined closer surface envelope, proposed second paper. Another commonly approach equivalent static where action represented force field applied structure. difficulty application taking all contribution modes. novel loads described third article, pseudo-inertia last both load representative reinforced concrete building. results compared those obtained several classical method.

参考文章(18)
Emilio Rosenblueth, Humberto Contreras, Approximate Design for Multicomponent Earthquakes Journal of Engineering Mechanics-asce. ,vol. 103, pp. 881- 893 ,(1977) , 10.1061/JMCEA3.0002280
Julio J. Hernández, Oscar A. López, Evaluation of combination rules for peak response calculation in three‐component seismic analysis Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. ,vol. 32, pp. 1585- 1602 ,(2003) , 10.1002/EQE.290
Oscar A. López, Anil K. Chopra, Julio J. Hernández, Evaluation of combination rules for maximum response calculation in multicomponent seismic analysis Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. ,vol. 30, pp. 1379- 1398 ,(2001) , 10.1002/EQE.68
Ajaya K. Gupta, Tasnim Hassan, Abhinav Gupta, Correlation coefficients for modal response combination of non-classically damped systems Nuclear Engineering and Design. ,vol. 165, pp. 67- 80 ,(1996) , 10.1016/0029-5493(96)01182-X
A.K. Gupta, S.L. Chu, Probable simultaneous response by the response spectrum method of analysis Nuclear Engineering and Design. ,vol. 44, pp. 93- 95 ,(1977) , 10.1016/0029-5493(77)90126-1
A.K. Gupta, S.L. Chu, Equivalent modal response method for seismic design of structures Nuclear Engineering and Design. ,vol. 44, pp. 87- 91 ,(1977) , 10.1016/0029-5493(77)90125-X
Wiggo Smeby, Armen der Kiureghian, Modal combination rules for multicomponent earthquake excitation Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. ,vol. 13, pp. 1- 12 ,(1985) , 10.1002/EQE.4290130103
A.K. Gupta, M.P. Singh, Design of column sections subjected to three components of earthquake Nuclear Engineering and Design. ,vol. 41, pp. 129- 133 ,(1977) , 10.1016/0029-5493(77)90100-5
S.L. Chu, M. Amin, S. Singh, Spectral treatment of actions of three earthquake components on structures Nuclear Engineering and Design. ,vol. 21, pp. 126- 136 ,(1972) , 10.1016/0029-5493(72)90091-X
Joseph Penzien, Makoto Watabe, Characteristics of 3‐dimensional earthquake ground motions Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. ,vol. 3, pp. 365- 373 ,(1974) , 10.1002/EQE.4290030407