How many human genes can be defined as housekeeping with current expression data

作者: Jiang Zhu , Fuhong He , Shuhui Song , Jing Wang , Jun Yu

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-172

关键词: TranscriptomeHuman genomeGeneBiologyExpressed sequence tagDNA microarrayMicroarray analysis techniquesGene expressionGene expression profilingGenetics

摘要: Housekeeping (HK) genes are ubiquitously expressed in all tissue/cell types and constitute a basal transcriptome for the maintenance of basic cellular functions. Partitioning transcriptomes into HK tissue-specific (TS) relatively is fundamental studying gene expression differentiation. Although many studies have aimed at large-scale thorough categorization human genes, meaningful consensus has yet to be reached. We collected two latest datasets (both EST microarray data) from public databases analyzed profiles 18 tissues that been well-documented by both data types. Benchmarked manually-curated collection (HK408), we demonstrated present sampling was far saturated, inadequacy limited detectability our understanding TS expressions. Due likely over-stringent threshold, showed higher false negative rate compared with data, leading significant underestimation genes. Based on found 40.0% currently annotated were universally least 16 tissues, as only 5.1% specifically single tissue. Our current EST-based estimate ranged 3,140 6,909 number, ten-fold increase comparison previous microarray-based estimates. concluded fraction depositories, broadly expressed. still preliminary required much more high-quality transcriptomic future studies. The new list categorized this study will useful genome-wide analyses structural functional features

参考文章(49)
Aaron J. Shatkin, James L. Manley, The ends of the affair: capping and polyadenylation. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. ,vol. 7, pp. 838- 842 ,(2000) , 10.1038/79583
Mythily Ganapathi, Pragya Srivastava, Sushanta Sutar, Kaushal Kumar, Dipayan Dasgupta, Gajinder Pal Singh, Vani Brahmachari, Samir K Brahmachari, Comparative analysis of chromatin landscape in regulatory regions of human housekeeping and tissue specific genes. BMC Bioinformatics. ,vol. 6, pp. 126- 126 ,(2005) , 10.1186/1471-2105-6-126
Robert L. Strausberg, Kenneth H. Buetow, Michael R. Emmert-Buck, Richard D. Klausner, The cancer genome anatomy project: building an annotated gene index. Trends in Genetics. ,vol. 16, pp. 103- 106 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01937-X
Melissa S. Jurica, Melissa J. Moore, Pre-mRNA Splicing: Awash in a Sea of Proteins Molecular Cell. ,vol. 12, pp. 5- 14 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00270-3
Alexander E. Vinogradov, Compactness of human housekeeping genes: selection for economy or genomic design? Trends in Genetics. ,vol. 20, pp. 248- 253 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.TIG.2004.03.006
Eli Eisenberg, Erez Y. Levanon, Human housekeeping genes are compact Trends in Genetics. ,vol. 19, pp. 362- 365 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00140-9
Thomas U Schwartz, Modularity within the architecture of the nuclear pore complex Current Opinion in Structural Biology. ,vol. 15, pp. 221- 226 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.SBI.2005.03.003
Albin Sandelin, Piero Carninci, Boris Lenhard, Jasmina Ponjavic, Yoshihide Hayashizaki, David A. Hume, Mammalian RNA polymerase II core promoters: insights from genome-wide studies. Nature Reviews Genetics. ,vol. 8, pp. 424- 436 ,(2007) , 10.1038/NRG2026
A. I. Su, M. P. Cooke, K. A. Ching, Y. Hakak, J. R. Walker, T. Wiltshire, A. P. Orth, R. G. Vega, L. M. Sapinoso, A. Moqrich, A. Patapoutian, G. M. Hampton, P. G. Schultz, J. B. Hogenesch, Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 99, pp. 4465- 4470 ,(2002) , 10.1073/PNAS.012025199
O. Thellin, W. Zorzi, B. Lakaye, B. De Borman, B. Coumans, G. Hennen, T. Grisar, A. Igout, E. Heinen, Housekeeping genes as internal standards: use and limits. Journal of Biotechnology. ,vol. 75, pp. 291- 295 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00163-7