Transparency in Public Life: A Quantum Cognition Perspective
作者： Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky , François Dubois
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-15931-7_17
关键词: Public life 、 Quantum 、 Mental representation 、 Cognitive psychology 、 Framing (social sciences) 、 Psychology 、 Quantum cognition 、 Bohr model 、 Cognition 、 Social psychology 、 Existential quantification
摘要: In this paper we investigate the implications of assuming that citizens are cognitively constrained for transparency in public life. We model cognitive limitations as reflecting a quantum property people’s mental representations world. There exists multiplicity incompatible (Bohr) complementary situation. As consequence framing information plays crucial role. show additional can be detrimental to agent: he may become more confused. suggest some design agency’s website.
springer.com
archives-ouvertes.fr
sci-hub.st 参考文章(22)
Beth Simone Noveck, Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful ,(2009)
Andrei Khrennikov, Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance ,(2010)
Jerome R. Busemeyer, Peter D. Bruza, Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision ,(2012)
Jerome R Busemeyer, Zheng Wang, James T Townsend, None, Quantum dynamics of human decision-making Journal of Mathematical Psychology. ,vol. 50, pp. 220- 241 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JMP.2006.01.003
V.I. Danilov, A. Lambert-Mogiliansky, Measurable Systems and Behavioral Sciences Mathematical Social Sciences. ,vol. 55, pp. 315- 340 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.MATHSOCSCI.2007.10.004
Jerome R. Busemeyer, Rachel Barkan, Zhengping Ma, Xuyang Li, Ethan Weg, Dynamic and consequential consistency of choices between paths of decision trees. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. ,vol. 129, pp. 530- 545 ,(2000) , 10.1037//0096-3445.129.4.530
Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, Choices, Values, and Frames ,(2000)
Itzhak Gilboa, David Schmeidler, MAxmin expected utility with non-unique prior Journal of Mathematical Economics. ,vol. 18, pp. 141- 153 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9
V. I. Danilov, A. Lambert-Mogiliansky, Expected utility theory under non-classical uncertainty Theory and Decision. ,vol. 68, pp. 25- 47 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S11238-009-9142-6
Itzhak Gilboa, Andrew Postlewaite, David Schmeidler, Rationality of belief or: why savage’s axioms are neither necessary nor sufficient for rationality Synthese. ,vol. 187, pp. 11- 31 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S11229-011-0034-2