Poaching regulates the legally hunted wolf population in Finland

作者: Johanna Suutarinen , Ilpo Kojola

DOI: 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2017.08.031

关键词: GeographyPoachingPopulationCanisCause specific mortalityDemographyPopulation sizeEcology

摘要: Abstract Poaching may threaten population viability and can occur in both non-harvested legally harvested populations. Telemetry facilitates the determination of fates individual animals, resultant mortality scenarios be used to evaluate role poaching changes. Finland's hunted wolf ( Canis lupus ) fluctuated between 100 300 animals during 1998–2016, this cannot explained by rates legal hunting other known mortalities alone. We examined created different based on multi-source information among 130 collared wolves. has been primary cause death followed hunting. calculated survival rate cause-specific risk; wolves whose were unknown censored. As one event alternatives (unknown fate or cause), censoring was related social status; breeding adults more often poached, whereas dispersers two sets procedure (random non-random), for sets, we 4 ranging from high no decreasing confidence data. Annual ranged 0.11–0.24 (high scenario) 0.43–0.60 (no poaching); dropped mid-winter. The varied years less than 0.09–0.13 up 0.31–0.43. consider a regulatory factor; it focused seemed escalate as response increased size. conclude that tolerance carnivores promoted alone, so comprehensive conservation efforts are needed.

参考文章(53)
Craig Hilton-Taylor, Russell A. Mittermeier, Caroline Pollock, David Brackett, 2000 IUCN red list of threatened species IUCN--The World Conservation Union. ,(2000)
Daniel W. S. Challender, Douglas C. MacMillan, Poaching is more than an Enforcement Problem Conservation Letters. ,vol. 7, pp. 484- 494 ,(2014) , 10.1111/CONL.12082
David R. Cox, Regression Models and Life-Tables Springer Series in Statistics. ,vol. 34, pp. 527- 541 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37
Wynne E. Moss, Mathew W. Alldredge, Jonathan N. Pauli, Quantifying risk and resource use for a large carnivore in an expanding urban-wildland interface Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 53, pp. 371- 378 ,(2016) , 10.1111/1365-2664.12563
Nicholas J. DeCesare, Mark Hebblewhite, Paul M. Lukacs, David Hervieux, Evaluating sources of censoring and truncation in telemetry‐based survival data Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 80, pp. 138- 148 ,(2016) , 10.1002/JWMG.991
S. Dressel, C. Sandström, G. Ericsson, A meta‐analysis of studies on attitudes toward bears and wolves across Europe 1976–2012 Conservation Biology. ,vol. 29, pp. 565- 574 ,(2015) , 10.1111/COBI.12420
Kate Graham, Andrew P. Beckerman, Simon Thirgood, Human–predator–prey conflicts: ecological correlates, prey losses and patterns of management Biological Conservation. ,vol. 122, pp. 159- 171 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2004.06.006
P. K. Andersen, R. D. Gill, Cox's Regression Model for Counting Processes: A Large Sample Study Annals of Statistics. ,vol. 10, pp. 1100- 1120 ,(1982) , 10.1214/AOS/1176345976
Jukka Bisi, Tuija Liukkonen, Sakari Mykrä, Mari Pohja-Mykrä, Sami Kurki, The good bad wolf—wolf evaluation reveals the roots of the Finnish wolf conflict European Journal of Wildlife Research. ,vol. 56, pp. 771- 779 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S10344-010-0374-0