Forest Sustainability and the Social Context: Applying the Montreal Process Criteria and Indicators

作者: Guy C. Robertson

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6723-6_5

关键词: Environmental planningSocial environmentContext (language use)DynamismProcess (engineering)Public debateSet (psychology)Function (engineering)SustainabilityBusinessEnvironmental economics

摘要: Criteria and indicators (C&I) are increasingly being used to gauge sustainability in various contexts. The common approach is arrange a set of under several overarching criteria, usually spanning ecological, social, economic dimensions. In this way, social elements explicitly recognized as crucial the challenge assuring sustainability. theory, after populating with appropriate information, C&I then evaluated relative established benchmarks for each indicator. practice, however, task setting agreed upon often aside owing lack consensus or conceptual difficulties deriving quantified measure within context single indicator indicators. These can be especially pronounced case socioeconomic measures where high degree dynamism confusion between sustainable outcomes desired predominate. these cases, serve an input broader public debate about sustainability, falling short explicit determination which may have been designed but still serving valuable function through its ability organize communicate vital information interdisciplinary context.

参考文章(22)
Keith M. Reynolds, EMDS: Using a Logic Framework to Assess Forest Ecosystem Sustainability Journal of Forestry. ,vol. 99, pp. 26- 30 ,(2001) , 10.1093/JOF/99.6.26
Gro Harlem Brundtland, Our common future Earth and Us#R##N#Population–Resources–Environment–Development. pp. 29- 31 ,(1987) , 10.1016/B978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5
George Sessions, Bill Devall, Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered ,(1985)
H. Ken Cordell, R. Jeff Teasley, John Loomis, Michael A. Tarrant, Shela H. Mou, J. Michael Bowker, Carter Betz, Donald B.K. English, John C. Bergstrom, Outdoor recreation in American life : a national assessment of demand and supply trends Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publishing. xii, 449 p.. ,(1999)
K. Freerk Wiersum, 200 Years of Sustainability in Forestry: Lessons from History Environmental Management. ,vol. 19, pp. 321- 329 ,(1995) , 10.1007/BF02471975
William E Fox, Daniel W McCollum, John E Mitchell, Louis E Swanson, Urs P Kreuter, John A Tanaka, Gary R Evans, H Theodore Heintz, Robert P Breckenridge, Paul H Geissler, None, An Integrated Social, Economic, and Ecologic Conceptual (ISEEC) Framework for Considering Rangeland Sustainability Society & Natural Resources. ,vol. 22, pp. 593- 606 ,(2009) , 10.1080/08941920802247894
J. Romm, Sustainable forests and sustainable forestry Journal of Forestry. ,vol. 92, ,(1994)
Barbara J. Bentz, Jacques Régnière, Christopher J Fettig, E. Matthew Hansen, Jane L. Hayes, Jeffrey A. Hicke, Rick G. Kelsey, Jose F. Negrón, Steven J. Seybold, Climate Change and Bark Beetles of the Western United States and Canada: Direct and Indirect Effects BioScience. ,vol. 60, pp. 602- 613 ,(2010) , 10.1525/BIO.2010.60.8.6
Rajesh Kumar Singh, H.R. Murty, S.K. Gupta, A.K. Dikshit, An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies Ecological Indicators. ,vol. 15, pp. 281- 299 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2011.01.007
G.T. McDonald, M.B. Lane, Converging global indicators for sustainable forest management Forest Policy and Economics. ,vol. 6, pp. 63- 70 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00101-6