Cost and performance of some carbon capture technology options for producing different quality CO2 product streams

作者: Richard T.J. Porter , Michael Fairweather , Clea Kolster , Niall Mac Dowell , Nilay Shah

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJGGC.2016.11.020

关键词: Waste managementCost estimateProcess simulationCoalFlue gasIntegrated gasification combined cycleEngineeringPower stationCombustionCarbon capture and storage

摘要: Abstract A techno-economic assessment of power plants with CO2 capture technologies a focus on process scenarios that deliver different grades product purity is presented. The three leading are considered, namely; oxyfuel combustion, pre-combustion and post-combustion capture. study uses combination simulation flue gas cleaning processes, modelling plant cost performance calculator literature values key criteria in order to evaluate the performance, considered options. For combustion plants, raw processing strategies compression dehydration only, double flash system purification distillation considered. Analysis options based integrated gasification combined cycle using physical solvent systems for capturing sulfur species via routes; co-capture impurities stream Selexol™ solvent, separate Selexol™, Rectisol® CO2. was made without some conventional pollution control devices. results highlight wide variation scenarios. devices offers high (99.99 mol%) average technologies. calculations performed will be use further analyses whole chain CCS safe economic capture, transport storage

参考文章(28)
Edward S. Rubin, John E. Davison, Howard J. Herzog, The cost of CO2 capture and storage International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. ,vol. 40, pp. 378- 400 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.IJGGC.2015.05.018
Joo-Youp Lee, Tim C. Keener, Y. Jeffery Yang, Potential flue gas impurities in carbon dioxide streams separated from coal-fired power plants. Journal of The Air & Waste Management Association. ,vol. 59, pp. 725- 732 ,(2009) , 10.3155/1047-3289.59.6.725
Gabriele Pipitone, Olav Bolland, Power generation with CO2 capture: Technology for CO2 purification International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. ,vol. 3, pp. 528- 534 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.IJGGC.2009.03.001
Richard T.J. Porter, Michael Fairweather, Mohamed Pourkashanian, Robert M. Woolley, The range and level of impurities in CO2 streams from different carbon capture sources International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. ,vol. 36, pp. 161- 174 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.IJGGC.2015.02.016
Erika de Visser, Chris Hendriks, Maria Barrio, Mona J. Mølnvik, Gelein de Koeijer, Stefan Liljemark, Yann Le Gallo, Dynamis CO2 quality recommendations International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. ,vol. 2, pp. 478- 484 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.IJGGC.2008.04.006
Anamaria Padurean, Calin-Cristian Cormos, Paul-Serban Agachi, Pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture by gas-liquid absorption for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plants International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. ,vol. 7, pp. 1- 11 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.IJGGC.2011.12.007
Li Sun, Robin Smith, Rectisol wash process simulation and analysis Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 39, pp. 321- 328 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.05.049
Guillermo Ordorica-Garcia, Peter Douglas, Eric Croiset, Ligang Zheng, Technoeconomic evaluation of IGCC power plants for CO2 avoidance Energy Conversion and Management. ,vol. 47, pp. 2250- 2259 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2005.11.020
Alfons Kather, Sven Kownatzki, Assessment of the different parameters affecting the CO2 purity from coal fired oxyfuel process International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. ,vol. 5, ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.IJGGC.2011.05.025