The Relative Contributions of the X Chromosome and Autosomes to Local Adaptation

作者: Clémentine Lasne , Carla M. Sgrò , Tim Connallon

DOI: 10.1534/GENETICS.116.194670

关键词: Genetic modelQuantitative geneticsPopulationEvolutionary biologyGeneticsBiologySex linkageLocal adaptationEffective population sizeAutosomeGenetic divergence

摘要: Models of sex chromosome and autosome evolution yield key predictions about the genomic basis adaptive divergence, such models have been important in guiding empirical research comparative genomics studies speciation. In addition to differentiation that occurs between species over time, selection also favors genetic divergence across geographic space, with subpopulations single evolving conspicuous differences traits involved adaptation local environmental conditions. The potential contribution chromosomes (the X or Z ) remains unclear, as we currently lack theory directly links spatial variation -linked autosomal genes. Here, develop population explicitly consider effects dominance, effective size, sex-specific migration on relative contributions genes adaptation. We show should nearly always disproportionately contribute presence gene flow. considerations dominance size—which play pivotal roles faster- species—have surprisingly little influence Instead, sex-biased is primary mediator strength large- effects. Our results novel role outline approaches evolutionary quantitative genetics could build upon this new theory.

参考文章(86)
Mascha Bischoff, Robert A. Raguso, Andreas Jürgens, Diane R. Campbell, Context-dependent reproductive isolation mediated by floral scent and color. Evolution. ,vol. 69, pp. 1- 13 ,(2015) , 10.1111/EVO.12558
Brian Charlesworth, Deborah Charlesworth, Elements of Evolutionary Genetics ,(2010)
Daniel L. Hartl, Andrew G. Clark, Principles of population genetics ,(1980)
Ying Tang, Tomohisa Yukawa, Richard M Bateman, Hong Jiang, Hua Peng, Phylogeny and classification of the East Asian Amitostigma alliance (Orchidaceae: Orchideae) based on six DNA markers BMC Evolutionary Biology. ,vol. 15, pp. 1- 32 ,(2015) , 10.1186/S12862-015-0376-3
John H. Gillespie, The causes of molecular evolution ,(1991)
Brian Charlesworth, Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation Nature Reviews Genetics. ,vol. 10, pp. 195- 205 ,(2009) , 10.1038/NRG2526
Huateng Huang, Daniel L. Rabosky, Sex-linked genomic variation and its relationship to avian plumage dichromatism and sexual selection. BMC Evolutionary Biology. ,vol. 15, pp. 199- 199 ,(2015) , 10.1186/S12862-015-0480-4
Federico Manna, Guillaume Martin, Thomas Lenormand, Fitness Landscapes: An Alternative Theory for the Dominance of Mutation Genetics. ,vol. 189, pp. 923- 937 ,(2011) , 10.1534/GENETICS.111.132944
Daven C. Presgraves, Sex chromosomes and speciation in Drosophila Trends in Genetics. ,vol. 24, pp. 336- 343 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.TIG.2008.04.007
John Maynard Smith, None, Natural selection and the concept of a protein space. Nature. ,vol. 225, pp. 563- 564 ,(1970) , 10.1038/225563A0