Which long-baseline neutrino experiments are preferable?

作者: V. Barger , P. Huber , D. Marfatia , W. Winter

DOI: 10.1103/PHYSREVD.76.053005

关键词: Order (ring theory)Neutrino FactoryParticle physicsParticle identificationNuMINeutrino oscillationFermilabNeutrinoNeutrino detectorNuclear physicsPhysics

摘要: We discuss the physics of superbeam upgrades, where we focus on T2KK, a NuMI beam line based experiment NO\ensuremath{\nu}A*, and wide-band (WBB) independent line. For find that Japan-Korea baseline helps resolve parameter degeneracies, but improvement due to correlated systematics between two detectors (using identical detectors) is only moderate. an upgrade NO\ensuremath{\nu}A with liquid argon detector, demonstrate Ash River site preferred compared alternatives, such as at second oscillation maximum, optimal within U.S. WBB experiment, high proton energies long decay tunnels are preferable. compare water Cherenkov technologies, break-even point in detector cost about $4\ensuremath{\mathbin:}1$. In order potential different experimental configurations, use concept exposure normalize performance. experiments WBBs best concept. NO\ensuremath{\nu}A* could be competitive sufficient luminosity. If ${sin}^{2}2{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{13}g0.01$, can perform better than neutrino factory.

参考文章(42)
R.N. Mohapatra, A.Y. Smirnov, Neutrino Mass and New Physics Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science. ,vol. 56, pp. 569- 628 ,(2006) , 10.1146/ANNUREV.NUCL.56.080805.140534
V. Barger, A. M. Gago, D. Marfatia, W. J. C. Teves, B. P. Wood, R. Zukanovich Funchal, Neutrino oscillation parameters from MINOS, ICARUS, and OPERA combined Physical Review D. ,vol. 65, pp. 053016- ,(2002) , 10.1103/PHYSREVD.65.053016
P. Huber, M. Lindner, M. Rolinec, T. Schwetz, W. Winter, Prospects of accelerator and reactor neutrino oscillation experiments for the coming ten years Physical Review D. ,vol. 70, pp. 073014- ,(2004) , 10.1103/PHYSREVD.70.073014
Patrick Huber, Joachim Kopp, Manfred Lindner, Mark Rolinec, Walter Winter, From Double Chooz to Triple Chooz - Neutrino Physics at the Chooz Reactor Complex Journal of High Energy Physics. ,vol. 2006, pp. 072- 072 ,(2006) , 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/072
PROGRESS IN THE PHYSICS OF MASSIVE NEUTRINOS International Journal of Modern Physics E-nuclear Physics. ,vol. 12, pp. 569- 647 ,(2003) , 10.1142/S0218301303001430
Masaki Ishitsuka, Takaaki Kajita, Hisakazu Minakata, Hiroshi Nunokawa, Resolving the neutrino mass hierarchy and CP degeneracy by two identical detectors with different baselines Physical Review D. ,vol. 72, pp. 033003- ,(2005) , 10.1103/PHYSREVD.72.033003
Kaoru Hagiwara, Naotoshi Okamura, Ken-ichi Senda, Solving the neutrino parameter degeneracy by measuring the T2K off-axis beam in Korea Physics Letters B. ,vol. 637, pp. 266- 273 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.PHYSLETB.2006.04.041
Takaaki Kajita, Hisakazu Minakata, Shoei Nakayama, Hiroshi Nunokawa, Resolving the eightfold neutrino parameter degeneracy by two identical detectors with different baselines Physical Review D. ,vol. 75, pp. 013006- ,(2007) , 10.1103/PHYSREVD.75.013006
V. Barger, Patrick Huber, Danny Marfatia, Walter Winter, Upgraded experiments with super neutrino beams: Reach versus exposure Physical Review D. ,vol. 76, pp. 031301- ,(2007) , 10.1103/PHYSREVD.76.031301
V. Barger, D. Marfatia, K. Whisnant, Breaking eightfold degeneracies in neutrinoCPviolation, mixing, and mass hierarchy Physical Review D. ,vol. 65, pp. 073023- ,(2002) , 10.1103/PHYSREVD.65.073023