作者: Annette S. Strömgren , Dorthe Goldschmidt , Mogens Groenvold , Morten Aa. Petersen , Pernille T. Jensen
DOI: 10.1002/CNCR.10222
关键词: Medicine 、 Quality of life (healthcare) 、 Public health 、 Palliative care 、 Cancer 、 Physical therapy 、 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale 、 Depression (differential diagnoses) 、 Medical record 、 Epidemiology
摘要: BACKGROUND Research in palliative care is considered difficult due to the poor health of patients. However, patient-provided data are essential for a thorough description patient symptomatology and evaluation care. METHODS The authors examined feasibility questionnaire-based study using European Organization Research Treatment Cancer quality-of-life instrument EORTC QLQ-C30, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) cancer patients who were receiving care. This report describes participating examines differences between three functions: inpatient, outpatient, home care. RESULTS Of 267 eligible referred department medicine, initial self-assessment questionnaires obtained from 176 (65.9%). The 91 nonparticipants older had lower Karnofsky Performance status (KPS) values than participants. Almost all suffered impaired role function physical high levels pain, fatigue, other symptoms. According HADS, 47% depression. Outpatients better scores inpatients function, cognitive depression, inactivity. CONCLUSIONS It possible carry out consecutive care, achieving rather complete these was very pronounced. able detect clinically important places service. 2002;94:512–20. © 2002 American Society.