Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study.

作者: Linda Basse , Dorthe Hjort Jakobsen , Linda Bardram , Per Billesb??lle , Claus Lund

DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000154149.85506.36

关键词: RandomizationConcomitantClinical trialRegimenRandomized controlled trialPatient satisfactionMedicineLaparoscopyMortality rateSurgery

摘要: Open colonic resection is usually associated with a hospital stay of about 6 to 11 days and complication rate 15% 20%.1–6 Introduction laparoscopic-assisted has reduced the 4 8 days, same or slightly lower morbidity in randomized trials.1–6 Concomitant these technical developments, an increased body evidence been developed demonstrate that perioperative care regimens, including optimized pain relief, early oral feeding, mobilization, have profound effects improve postoperative recovery outcome.7,8 These so-called multimodal rehabilitation programs fast-track surgery7,8 applied after laparoscopic9,10 open11 resection, resulting 2 3 days. Unfortunately, assessment laparoscopic versus open on outcome studies1–6 not included revision principles adjusted recent scientific data,7,8 therefore difference between remains be determined. Such studies require regimen observer-blinded minimize treatment bias due expected benefits minimal invasive surgery other new surgical techniques.12 The aim this study was assess functional where both groups received program observer patient-blinded design, planned discharge 48 hours.

参考文章(30)
Thue Bisgaard, Mimi Kjærsgaard, Anne Bernhard, Henrik Kehlet, Jacob Rosenberg, Computerized monitoring of physical activity and sleep in postoperative abdominal surgery patients. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. ,vol. 15, pp. 1- 8 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1009930026753
Marco Braga, Andrea Vignali, Luca Gianotti, Walter Zuliani, Giovanni Radaelli, Paola Gruarin, Paolo Dellabona, Valerio Di Carlo, Laparoscopic Versus Open Colorectal Surgery Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 236, pp. 759- 767 ,(2002) , 10.1097/00000658-200212000-00008
Anthony J. Senagore, Hans J. Duepree, Conor P. Delaney, Karen M. Brady, Victor W. Fazio, Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: A 30-month experience Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 46, pp. 503- 509 ,(2003) , 10.1007/S10350-004-6590-5
L. Bardram, P. Funch-Jensen, H. Kehlet, Rapid rehabilitation in elderly patients after laparoscopic colonic resection British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 87, pp. 1540- 1545 ,(2002) , 10.1046/J.1365-2168.2000.01559.X
Linda Basse, Dorthe Hjort Jakobsen, Per Billesbølle, Mads Werner, Henrik Kehlet, A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 232, pp. 51- 57 ,(2000) , 10.1097/00000658-200007000-00008
Richard Horton, Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers The Lancet. ,vol. 347, pp. 984- 985 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90137-3
A.W Majeed, G Troy, A Smythe, M.W.R Reed, C.J Stoddard, J Peacock, A.G Johnson, Jp Nicholl, Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy The Lancet. ,vol. 347, pp. 989- 994 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90143-9
Henrik Kehlet, Surgical Stress Response: Does Endoscopic Surgery Confer an Advantage? World Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 23, pp. 801- 807 ,(1999) , 10.1007/S002689900583
L. Basse, J. L. Madsen, P. Billesb�lle, L. Bardram, H. Kehlet, Gastrointestinal transit after laparoscopic versus open colonic resection Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 17, pp. 1919- 1922 ,(2003) , 10.1007/S00464-003-9013-0