Aesthetic Judgments of Novel Graphic Patterns: Analyses of Individual Judgments:

作者: Thomas Jacobsen , Lea Höfel

DOI: 10.2466/PMS.2002.95.3.755

关键词: PsychologyGroup levelSocial psychologyGroup modelExperimental aestheticsJudgment analysisNomothetic and idiographicStimulus ComplexityBeauty

摘要: Aesthetic judgments were investigated using a combined nomothetic and idiographic approach. Participants judged novel graphic patterns with respect to their own personal definitions of “beauty” Judgment analysis was employed derive individual case models judgment strategies as well group model. As predicted, symmetry had the highest correlations aesthetic beauty. Stimulus complexity second-highest correlate positive evaluation. Thus, there agreement at level. The analyses, however, indicated substantial differences. These included use or cues that contrary main use, e.g., few participants considered nonsymmetric more beautiful. findings suggest exclusive consideration model would have leveled differences been misleading. is significant; analyses represent in...

参考文章(8)
Thomas R. Stewart, Chapter 2 Judgment Analysis: Procedures Advances in Psychology. ,vol. 54, pp. 41- 74 ,(1988) , 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62170-6
Harold Pashler, Coordinate frame for symmetry detection and object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. ,vol. 16, pp. 150- 163 ,(1990) , 10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.150
D. E. Berlyne, Aesthetics and psychobiology ,(1971)
D. E. Berlyne, Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value Attention Perception & Psychophysics. ,vol. 8, pp. 279- 286 ,(1970) , 10.3758/BF03212593
Russell Eisenman, Complexity-simplicity: I. Preference for symmetry and rejection of complexity Psychonomic Science. ,vol. 8, pp. 169- 170 ,(1967) , 10.3758/BF03331603
Konecni Vj, DETERMINANTS OF AESTHETIC PREFERENCE AND EFFECTS OF EXPOSURE TO AESTHETIC STIMULI: SOCIAL, EMOTIONAL, AND COGNITIVE FACTORS Progress in experimental personality research. ,vol. 9, pp. 149- 197 ,(1979)
Kenneth R. Hammond, Thomas R. Stewart, Berndt Brehmer, Derick O. Steinmann, 10 – SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY Human Judgement and Decision Processes. pp. 271- 312 ,(1975) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-397250-7.50016-7